TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Could you train a chatbot like a GAN?

2 pointsby julianbusealmost 3 years ago
I was reading something about how google's new chatbot fails the turing test when you try to elicit machine behaviour from it. Could one train a chatbot that passes the turing test by concurrently training two nets, one that is the chatbot and another that detects whether it's a chatbot or a real conversation? I inagine that this should work theoretically, but I'm by no means an expert.

2 comments

usrbinbashalmost 3 years ago
&gt; and another that detects whether it&#x27;s a chatbot or a real conversation?<p>Problem is: How would it do that? In order to for a machine to accurately decide whether its conversation partner is a human or another machine, it would require a model that already accurately understands the difference.<p>So it&#x27;s basically a hen-and-egg problem; In order to make the Discriminator for a GAN that should pass the Turing test, I need a machine that could already pass the Turing Test.<p>Sure, we could feed it billions of human conversations, and train it to recognize some sort of difference, and that could result in a Generator which somewhat mimics the way human conversation works, but that&#x27;s not what the Turing Test evaluates...when I ask something that is nonsensical like &quot;what does the magnetopause smell like&quot;, and the system simply simulates a human speech pattern along the lines of &quot;i don&#x27;t know, I never tried smelling it&quot;, instead of showing <i>actual understanding about the universe</i> that tells it that the question is absurd, it may fool the Discriminator-Algorithm of the GAN, but its not going to convince humans for long.
shreyshnaccountalmost 3 years ago
Idk, let&#x27;s try?