TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Hinge and Its Implementation of the Gale–Shapley algorithm

117 pointsby kaashmoneealmost 3 years ago

5 comments

awinter-pyalmost 3 years ago
I mean 1) &#x27;stable matching&#x27; is not how anyone would describe the experience of using IRL meetup apps<p>2) at best gale-shapley is being used for <i>ranking</i>, not for preference inference; IMO they removed the &#x27;have you met&#x27; feature (guessing because users found it invasive and hated it), but would be interesting to use it for scheduling meeting slots, a resource problem more similar to med school matching. The idea of using math to meet a mate goes back at least to kepler <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.npr.org&#x2F;sections&#x2F;krulwich&#x2F;2014&#x2F;05&#x2F;15&#x2F;312537965&#x2F;how-to-marry-the-right-girl-a-mathematical-solution" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.npr.org&#x2F;sections&#x2F;krulwich&#x2F;2014&#x2F;05&#x2F;15&#x2F;312537965&#x2F;h...</a><p>3) gale-shapley is old science about how to rank given preferences, but the actual interesting question is how they&#x27;re detecting preferences. What are the factors? Are some factors excluded? What can hinge (and their cousins at match.com and elsewhere) detect about a person from their profile + interactions? Are they using image analysis &#x2F; NLP on profiles &#x2F; chats?<p>(they&#x27;re definitely not just using the user settings toggles for preferences; at minimum, they must have a global rank for showing popular profiles at the top of the stack. Also it makes sense this stuff is secret, it&#x27;s a liability landmine)
评论 #31756055 未加载
评论 #31765757 未加载
jimmygrapesalmost 3 years ago
Has Hinge avoided the dark patterns of the Match Group and&#x2F;or Bumble (not sure if they were subsumed yet) in which men are shown &quot;likes&quot; only as bait to purchase a premium product and only rarely show up as potential matches? If so, what is their monetization strategy? It is fairly clear that a successful result in a dating app means at least one less user, polygamy and &quot;ENM&quot; notwithstanding. I believe that some apps have used success and subsequent loss of user as marketing to &quot;prove it works&quot; but I haven&#x27;t seen that tactic lately. How does Hinge work?<p>Aside and FWIW I just starting using Bumble&#x2F;Tinder after years of refusing, which came after years of a (disastrous) relationship developed via friend-of-a-friend-of-a-relative and I can&#x27;t fathom how things work anymore since I don&#x27;t encounter anybody of the gender I&#x27;m into in contexts where it&#x27;s appropriate to initiate contact. I know the tropes and standard advice (hobbies, church, etc) but it ain&#x27;t working anymore.
评论 #31751406 未加载
评论 #31751139 未加载
评论 #31749543 未加载
评论 #31749666 未加载
评论 #31750965 未加载
评论 #31749839 未加载
评论 #31749924 未加载
dumpsterdiveralmost 3 years ago
Can you imagine what it would have looked like if dating apps existed in the war ravaged nations of Eurasia post World War II? Ladies would have been fighting tooth and nail for a good man, because they were hard to find after the world went to war with itself.
评论 #31757331 未加载
评论 #31756290 未加载
评论 #31749893 未加载
armchairhackeralmost 3 years ago
Dating apps are so bad, the ratio of men:women matches would impress a red-pilled 4channer.<p>Most men get somewhere like 0-4 matches a week and most women get somewhere like 100-1000. That’s a 25x difference best-case scenario and often it’s over 100x. Which is kind of insane considering there are about 50&#x2F;50 men to women ratio in real life.<p>People say “the 20% top men get 80% of matches” but it’s worse than that. The 20% top men may get something reasonable like 3-4 matches a day, but your average women is getting something crazy like 1 match every 15 minutes.<p>Because a lot of men like to swipe right on nearly everyone and buy passes which get them unlimited swipes. And most women get extremely choosy and swipe right on only the super handsome nearly-perfect men, but you can’t even blame them when they have literally 1,000 matches.<p>On top of that, the bios suck. Even on Hinge. You can’t base someone off of 6 pictures and 3 quotes. If you’re not judging them on plain attractiveness &#x2F; photogenics, you’re judging them on one random quote or minor character trait you relate to.<p>Online dating sucks. You’re much better off trying to meet people in real-life situations, where there is a more reasonable ratio of men and women, you can learn more about people then their favorite vacation spots, and the people have a lot more time to learn more about you too.<p>Or, you can try meeting people online but not in a surface-level dating-oriented site. Plenty of people formed couples through discord or their favorite video games. Unfortunately my understanding is that most online places are still male-dominated, but hopefully that’s changing as we are becoming a more tech-oriented and women-inclusive society.
评论 #31749492 未加载
评论 #31750613 未加载
评论 #31749474 未加载
评论 #31749506 未加载
评论 #31749484 未加载
评论 #31750446 未加载
评论 #31749479 未加载
评论 #31749945 未加载
评论 #31749827 未加载
评论 #31752285 未加载
评论 #31749588 未加载
评论 #31752498 未加载
评论 #31757013 未加载
评论 #31756637 未加载
评论 #31755986 未加载
评论 #31750127 未加载
评论 #31749603 未加载
catsarebetteralmost 3 years ago
I mean, no one&#x27;s forcing anyone to use dating apps
评论 #31750089 未加载
评论 #31750189 未加载
评论 #31751128 未加载
评论 #31751302 未加载