TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Woodpeckers don't have built-in shock absorbers to protect their brain

54 pointsby lota-puttyalmost 3 years ago

11 comments

thrwyoilarticlealmost 3 years ago
&gt;The term “spongy bone” doesn’t mean that the bone is soft or can compress, he says. Rather, it indicates that the bone is porous and lightweight<p>So part of the misconception can be blamed on a connotation of a metaphor that doesn&#x27;t apply. Very common in physics!
kayodelycaonalmost 3 years ago
Neat!<p>Turns out that woodpeckers don’t need extra shock-absorbers. They are small enough that the normal fluid around their brain provides the protection it needs.
评论 #32126236 未加载
mythrwyalmost 3 years ago
Woodpeckers are super cool but whow can they be a menace.<p>There was one that would come knock my neighbors metal chimney years ago right at the crack of dawn. Poor guy could not sleep in. And the woodpecker kept coming back and doing it, presumably just to make a loud racket because there were no bugs obviously.<p>Another guy I know who was quite wealthy had a carved wooden lintel made for the top of his door. It was made in Mexico and quite intricate (and expensive). He proudly showed it to me over the door. A week later woodpeckers had ruined it.<p>They are still cool birds though.
rswervealmost 3 years ago
There’s a great video by a different scientist that explains the importance of size, mass, and duration of deceleration very clearly. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;a87TTL_c8_0" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;a87TTL_c8_0</a>
wubbfindelalmost 3 years ago
Doesn&#x27;t a woodpecker&#x27;s tongue also play a roll in protecting it? Or is the just a myth?
评论 #32126386 未加载
owynalmost 3 years ago
Pistol shrimp do though! Original article [0] and HN discussion from yesterday [1].<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;2022&#x2F;07&#x2F;pistol-shrimp-sport-tiny-helmets-to-protect-selves-from-their-own-shock-waves&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;2022&#x2F;07&#x2F;pistol-shrimp-sport-...</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=32080559" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=32080559</a>
bevacquaalmost 3 years ago
Turns out Leonardo was wrong after all<p>What a coincidence, just finished reading Walter Isaacson&#x27;s biography of Da Vinci yesterday
sethammonsalmost 3 years ago
Can&#x27;t read the article; does anyone else get redirected to some &quot;you are visitor N and a winner!&quot; shit? Firefox on iPhone fwiw.
评论 #32126372 未加载
winridalmost 3 years ago
Helps to not have your brain rest against cavities as sharp as knives, like humans.
marcodiegoalmost 3 years ago
That may explain the behavior of Woody Woodpecker.
评论 #32127799 未加载
MiguelX413almost 3 years ago
Sigma