Phoenix, not Pheonix.<p>Internetworks introduced tabs in the 90's and Opera was the 1st modern, mainstream browser to implement them.<p>Google captured massive market share with Chrome installers/hijackers added onto many(most?) 3rd party app installers in the late 2000's & early 2010's.<p>Love him, or hate him, Mozilla suffered massive 'brain drain' when Eich departed, aka, was shown the door.
This is not a useful summary of what happened.<p>In particular, it makes the classic mistake of comparing percentage of browser market as that market grew at a ridiculous rate and spread to more and "normal" people.<p>The kind of people who don't really notice if some app they installed also installed a new default browser for a small monetary kickback.<p><a href="https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/257159-google-chrome-bundling-with-adobe-java-whatever-else-boooo" rel="nofollow">https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/257159-google-chrome-...</a><p>That's the story. Everything else is what people want to project onto that.
> The main reason this utterly failed, is because there is literally no reason for people to use this, considering that most Phones came with Android pre-installed and nobody was mad enough to install FirefoxOS instead which came with no software support and had no unique selling point.<p>Mozilla spent tens of millions pushing Firefox OS app development: asking developers to build for an underpowered device that they couldn't buy, whose users spoke a different language, didn't want to spend money, and didn't yet exist.<p>Separately, every app built for Firefox for Android (yes, it has app support) worked on Firefox OS. The Android version had millions of active installs. Smart people were working on making web apps compilable to APKs, but that work was killed.<p>Meanwhile, what DID ship was an OS with two app stores: Firefox Marketplace and Everything.me. The latter was a spammy mess that gave glorified shortcuts baked into the home screen. Lots of folks didn't even know that the <i>actual</i> app store was.<p>Firefox declined because leadership put fools in charge of strategy. They were so high on their own supply that they thought fxos was going to make developers materialize out of thin air. It was wishful thinking at best.
Firefox the browser is great. The developers are great. Pretty much everyone else at mozilla (the execs, marketing, and the graphic designers that feel the need to reinvent some minor part of the wheel every 3-5 years to justify their existence) can all pound sand.<p>Someone needs to do to Firefox what Firefox did to Netscape, except this time instead of ditching a legacy codebase they need to ditch their woeful corporate leadership.