TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

At 88, Poker Legend Doyle Brunson Is Still Bluffing. Or Is He?

137 pointsby wallfloweralmost 3 years ago

10 comments

vaidhyalmost 3 years ago
The comments here are so heavily jargon laden that I have no idea what I was reading.. gto, plo, nlo, then with numbers behind them, etc.. Is there a glossary to understand those terms?
评论 #32216761 未加载
评论 #32217462 未加载
评论 #32216728 未加载
评论 #32217012 未加载
评论 #32216755 未加载
data4lyfealmost 3 years ago
The man is an absolute legend. And the most awesome thing about poker is that you can play until the end of your days if you can stomach the swings.
评论 #32215891 未加载
saucymewalmost 3 years ago
Highly recommend Doyle&#x27;s &quot;Poker Wisdom of a Champion&quot; for a throwback look at the wild days of poker in the 60&#x27;s.<p>The story of the tennis match prop bet alone was worth it. Let the dog die!
评论 #32217533 未加载
Victeriusalmost 3 years ago
For those of you who would like to learn the basics of poker, Johns Hopkins offers an online course: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hopkinspokercourse.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hopkinspokercourse.com&#x2F;</a><p>MIT OCW also has a course on poker theory: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ocw.mit.edu&#x2F;courses&#x2F;15-s50-poker-theory-and-analytics-january-iap-2015&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ocw.mit.edu&#x2F;courses&#x2F;15-s50-poker-theory-and-analytic...</a>
评论 #32213721 未加载
评论 #32215552 未加载
reillysealmost 3 years ago
It’s funny that the two examples used to illustrate his play (the 10 2) stories are examples of him making extremely bad reads on his opponent and bad beating them. I can only assume that’s him massaging the narrative a bit to help him win in the future, cause it isn’t great poker playing.
评论 #32218840 未加载
评论 #32214242 未加载
评论 #32219186 未加载
评论 #32217191 未加载
评论 #32214082 未加载
评论 #32216667 未加载
stevagealmost 3 years ago
Great article. The poem at the end is atrocious though.
fierroalmost 3 years ago
lots of misinformation here about the current state of play with respect to GTO. If you&#x27;re interested in understanding the principles of GTO and how amateurs currently leverage it check out the Finding Equilibrium youtube channel. Specifically, there&#x27;s a series where this guy teaches his girlfriend to play poker by building heuristics that generally mimic solver advice. It&#x27;s a cool way to see how solvers are changing the live poker game; from this relatively basic series you can extrapolate how professionals refine their strategies and heuristics to get very close to solver approval in the majority of situations.
评论 #32231804 未加载
评论 #32219272 未加载
评论 #32219259 未加载
dghughesalmost 3 years ago
If we use Betteridge&#x27;s law of headlines then it&#x27;s no.<p>I&#x27;m all in.
评论 #32214925 未加载
russeldunbaralmost 3 years ago
... He kind of is.
paulpauperalmost 3 years ago
<i>Besides the year in which he lost the $6 million, he says, he has never finished in the red.</i><p>that&#x27;s called tail risk. AIG made money every year except 2008. It still makes money.