Does anyone know whether this slip up by Apple is because the M2 should have been on 3nm, which was delayed? Honestly that's the only way I can really explain this. The M1 is actually the superior chip.
> All these values are no indication for the upcoming Pro models of the M2 that we expect in the updated MacBook Pro 14 and 16 models later this year since these chips are supposed to be manufactured in a new 3 nm process.<p>Wasn't that the same story we heard about the M2, too? I'm starting to think these rumors are some Mark Gurman originals...
Those M1 measurement do not align with the detail test done by Anandtech. Which leads to me to believe there is some sort of flaw or misjudgement in the test.<p>I have bookmarked this and may be taking another look at it later. Or if someone has time to dig deeper.