TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

How the U.S. lost the Next Big Thing to China – again

14 pointsby mecoalmost 3 years ago

3 comments

aurizonalmost 3 years ago
Flow batteries charge the battery fluid and store the charged fluid in a large tank insolution. It is pumped through the discharge electrodes and the charge drives the load. Depleted fluid goes to a used fluid tank. To charge it is pumped back through the same electrodes = charged = into the charged tank. They suit large stationary uses. The power density is low = limited by the solubility in the transport fluid and the nature of the 1&#x2F;2 cell in the Vanadium ReDox cycle.1.15 to 1.55 volts). Not sure what DOE patented, but it is far far safer than Lithium non flow storage, as well as cheaper. I am sure this can easily be made in the USA = mainly large tanks etc., but it is not a &#x27;cool&#x27; tech. Lots of Vanadium out there. I suspect the low voltage is part of the problem with lithium having 2-3 times the volumetric efficiency.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Vanadium_redox_battery" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Vanadium_redox_battery</a>
axusalmost 3 years ago
My takeaway from the article is that it was impractical to manufacture these in America, or get financing to do so. It sounds like the U.S. has a serious problem connecting manufacturing ideas with resources needed to implement them.
评论 #32335913 未加载
fspeechalmost 3 years ago
Does the DOE have a patent in China?