I was really excited to share this with my creative (& art) director(s) until I saw the pricing. It could be that I'm just too frugal, so I sent the link onward anyway. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure we'd be more than happy to pay for this. It's just that my first, personal reaction is that the monthly pricing model either feels too steep or is an awkward fit.<p>Why not pay per access or usage for each template with a slight markup against competitors for ease of use? The tool seems great but the current positioning made me want to immediately compare it to Adobe CC or even Figma. Granted, I haven't really given it a proper workout, but Adobe CC (pick your poison) and Figma both have more features. Figma is even cheaper. CC is also entrenched in everyone's budget, is only marginally more expensive, and has well established marketplaces for similar templates.
It always looks so silly to me when people use these weird frames. It's obviously a stock photo and it's just distracting, just show me the damn screenshot.
Canva also has support for creating mockups (<a href="https://www.canva.com/smartmockups" rel="nofollow">https://www.canva.com/smartmockups</a>, requires login). Though, this site seems to have more features at a glance.
In general how do projects like this avoid running afoul of design dress trademarks for depicting all these different 3d models of consumer products? Is it that the mockups aren't quite high enough fidelity to infringe specific manufacturers' designs, there is a broad fair use assumption, or it just hasn't been tested in court?