TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Two New Vim Plugins

33 pointsby telemachosover 13 years ago

4 comments

jherdmanover 13 years ago
Another alternative to Pathogen is Vundle (<a href="https://github.com/gmarik/vundle" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/gmarik/vundle</a>). I've been using this one for a while and really enjoy it.
评论 #3266737 未加载
评论 #3267063 未加载
moonbootsover 13 years ago
I've been trying to replicate the filetype specific bundles using pathogen's disabled bundle feature, so unbundle is a nice discovery. To allow for more flexibility such as enabling a bundle for more than one filetype but not all (e.g. just jvm languages), there can be a separate directory that contains all bundles, and these can be symlinked from ftbundle and bundle. This also allows disabling bundles that you're still testing.
knewterover 13 years ago
There's an awesome ruby gem called vimpack (<a href="http://github.com/bramswenson/vimpack" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/bramswenson/vimpack</a>) that makes it easy to install any VimL plugins from github directly, a la `vimpack install git@github.com:user/neat_vim_plugin.git` It uses pathogen on the backside to load the plugins. It also provides easily cloning your repo for use elsewhere. It's how I manage my vim configuration amongs multiple different computers / other developers can use my repo as a starting point. I &#60;3.
graywhover 13 years ago
So, Unbundle sounds like Vim's ftplugins. Are there global plugins out there that work for a single filetype and interfere with other filetypes?