TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: MacBook Pro M1 16GB vs. 32GB

17 pointsby kujin88over 2 years ago
Hi all I am an engineer&#x2F;part-time photographer that works a lot with photo&#x2F;video editing, and at the same time, have a couple of active Mobile Apps as side projects going on. My previous Mac from 2015 is showing sings of slow death and I wanted to jump onto Apple Silicon.<p>Wanted to see if 16GB is enough for me or would it be better to get a 32GB RAM instead. My idea is to keep it for at least 3-4 years from now. My use case is: Photoshop, some photo editing, video processing, and then, Mobile game development (Android mainly), maybe some work with Docker (running 5-6 containers simultaneously) while having other tools like Android Studio, Zoom, Brave and Edge Browsers with 20 tabs each, etc. open<p>Thanks a lot for the help!

15 comments

rcarrover 2 years ago
In the UK, the upgrade from 16GB to 32GB is £400 ($460). If you have the laptop for five years and presuming you are buying the laptop outright with no interest, the additional RAM will work out costing you 22 pence (25 cents) a day. For something as vital to both your professional life and hobbies as this laptop sounds, are you going to miss 22 pence a day?<p>Additionally, if you sell the laptop at the end of the five years or keep it for seven like your current computer, these daily costs will in actuality be even lower.
评论 #32725116 未加载
redwoolfover 2 years ago
Considering that RAM in the Macbook Pro is not upgradeable, buy as much RAM as you can afford now.
评论 #32720575 未加载
catnip09over 2 years ago
5-6 containers simultaneously with other applications?<p>64gb if you don&#x27;t want to end up with swap. 32gb is the bare minimum.<p>Ram on m1 is split between gpu and cpu. 16gb is more like 10gb available to the actual application.<p>Don&#x27;t believe in all the hype and misinformation surrounding ram efficiency on m1.<p>Swap is fast enough for most casual users to not notice the impact but as a developer or creator, you will definitely notice it.
评论 #32721808 未加载
评论 #32723471 未加载
评论 #32725088 未加载
j45over 2 years ago
Max Ram + CPU has always been a recipe for longevity of a laptop.<p>For me, RAM is at least a few seconds saved at every step, which adds up to minutes, hours, days and months saved. Waiting for a computer when you spend so much time on it is not something super worthwhile for me.<p>RAM remains like increased lung capacity for computers.<p>Apple silicon appears much more efficient per GB of RAM, which might reduce the need for RAM in average use cases.<p>It entirely remains to be seen if that effect remains as software and operating systems continue to become complex.<p>To imagine 32 GB is becoming the standards that 16 GB was a while ago doesn&#x27;t seem unreasonable.
michelbover 2 years ago
I&#x27;m coming from a hackintosh with 64GB of RAM. My workloads vary, from compiling apps, 4K video editing&#x2F;rendering, gaming, etc. I keep loads of tabs open (safari though), and rarely reboot and don&#x27;t close apps for days.<p>I bought a Mac Studio with 64GB, but I really feel I could have gotten 32GB and it would have been fine.<p>That said, reading your workload and apps you use, I would get 32GB. Keep in mind that the capacity of your SSD also determines the speed which helps in the event the OS needs to swap, so maybe don&#x27;t go for the smallest SSD.
评论 #32725156 未加载
评论 #32729368 未加载
latchkeyover 2 years ago
Can you afford 32? Get 32... or 64... more ram is always better.
评论 #32721268 未加载
maneeshover 2 years ago
I have an 8, a 16, and a 64<p>The 8gb was just not enough. It crashed through normal use often<p>16gb was greatttt but got slow and weird (audio devices would disappear, requiring a restart) , occasionally with Docker Desktop<p>64gb is a beast and I&#x27;m running parallels windows and parallels KDE and even ELECTRON apps simultaneously ( ;) )<p>If you can afford it, get the 64. If it&#x27;s too much, I&#x27;m guessing 32 will work very well also.
评论 #32725119 未加载
yilugurluover 2 years ago
I regret that I&#x27;ve chosen 16GB. I thought with the 1 TB fast SSD I could utilize the swap (also 400€ cheaper) and help Docker continue working seamlessly, but working with many containers and many tabs and App&#x27;s open I can feel the sluggishness switching between windows. If I were to buy new, I&#x27;d buy at least 32.
arunnandaover 2 years ago
You&#x27;ll quickly run of out 16. You&#x27;ll always need some apps that are bad at memory management.
david_allisonover 2 years ago
32GB minimum, 64GB recommended.<p>I restarted my Mac. Opened one tab in Chrome + Android Studio + emulator then ran a full unit test run. Memory usage spiked at around 27GB, then down to 17GB &#x27;App Memory&#x27; when idle.<p>I typically have 30-40GB usage (heavy browser usage &amp; 2&#x2F;3 heavy IDEs)
quintesover 2 years ago
Buy more if you can afford, for the future as you can’t do it later
muzaniover 2 years ago
&quot;Android Studio&quot;<p>Get the 32 GB.
评论 #32731929 未加载
9dcover 2 years ago
you might be able to easily outsource some&#x2F;most of the containers to a rpi&#x2F;server&#x2F;vps and save some ram.
kurupt213over 2 years ago
Always get the most ram you can afford
martinowen836over 2 years ago
I am also facing the same.