TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Rsync.net

80 pointsby 6ak74rfyover 2 years ago

16 comments

sphover 2 years ago
I&#x27;m a happy user.<p>I don&#x27;t have a very complicated setup: a daily rsync cron job from my workstation to my Synology NAS, and a daily cron job from my NAS to rsync.net. I told rsync.net to notify me if I stop uploading data for more than 7 days.<p>I could use borg, rclone, restic, etc. but rsync is used <i>everywhere</i>, not just backups, so it&#x27;s a pretty safe choice for long term storage IMO. (I was surprised to learn that rsync is only 26 years old)<p>That&#x27;s the extend of my backup system and I&#x27;m pretty happy with it. Sadly, I haven&#x27;t had the chance to put it to the test, one day if I feel brave enough I&#x27;ll format my hard drive and see if my backup strategy forgot anything :-)
评论 #32748995 未加载
评论 #32752294 未加载
crypt1dover 2 years ago
A big fan and a regular user of rsync.net here. I&#x27;ve used their borg offering on a number of occasions for myself and companies I worked with. I highly recommend them for their pricing and excellent support.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rsync.net&#x2F;products&#x2F;borg.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rsync.net&#x2F;products&#x2F;borg.html</a>
aborsyover 2 years ago
ZFS backup is the attractive part of this service. But that’s $60&#x2F;month for 5TB. It’s quite expensive, even accounting for a $5&#x2F;month full time VPS (enough RAM and CPU for ZFS receive). The ZFS offering was better until recently where the minimum storage was substantially increased.<p>On the other hand, for non-ZFS backups, there is Backblaze and other cheap storage.<p>It’s hard to make sense of rsync.net these days.
评论 #32756579 未加载
评论 #32750419 未加载
rexourover 2 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rsync.net&#x2F;products&#x2F;restic.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rsync.net&#x2F;products&#x2F;restic.html</a> advertises that rsync.net supports restic in append-only mode, but it doesn&#x27;t, and when I emailed support, they acknowledged that this didn&#x27;t work.<p>I&#x27;m surprised the docs are still up. I&#x27;ve seen others on HN mention this too: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=26508338" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=26508338</a>
评论 #32756653 未加载
schappimover 2 years ago
I&#x27;m amazed that rsync is not a registred trademark, internationally [1] or in Australia [2].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www3.wipo.int&#x2F;madrid&#x2F;monitor&#x2F;en&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www3.wipo.int&#x2F;madrid&#x2F;monitor&#x2F;en&#x2F;</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;search.ipaustralia.gov.au&#x2F;trademarks&#x2F;search&#x2F;quick&#x2F;result?q=rsync" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;search.ipaustralia.gov.au&#x2F;trademarks&#x2F;search&#x2F;quick&#x2F;re...</a>
评论 #32747946 未加载
threatofrainover 2 years ago
I&#x27;m not sure why link to the front page of rsync.net when there&#x27;s no new update, but for anyone considering rsync, one thing to note is that they have other products for incredible prices.
评论 #32748098 未加载
luocover 2 years ago
What&#x27;s the advantage of this over Hetzner Storage Box[0]? Seems to be the better option if I don&#x27;t go into petabyte scale...<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.hetzner.com&#x2F;de&#x2F;storage&#x2F;storage-box" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.hetzner.com&#x2F;de&#x2F;storage&#x2F;storage-box</a>
评论 #32748192 未加载
评论 #32748544 未加载
评论 #32747962 未加载
评论 #32747799 未加载
AnonCover 2 years ago
I’ve been with SpiderOak for a while and am considering dropping it (the client is buggy and the company seems to have moved on to other services, letting this die). I’ve seen rsync.net posted here before, and I’ve also seen rsync (rsync.net’s founder’s HN account) comment here often.<p>One thing I would like to see on rsync.net is a single page that shows the different prices for a specific chosen storage capacity, including the (special) borg account pricing. Perhaps a separate page for the “HN Readers discount” (at rsync.net&#x2F;hn, maybe?) too? Trawling through older order links with specific codes posted on HN seems a bit tedious (and likely not reliable since those could be outdated).
评论 #32752601 未加载
评论 #32748113 未加载
platelmintoover 2 years ago
(0 experience in offsite backups so apologies if this question seems a bit dumb)<p>I&#x27;m confused - can this be used as a simple cloud storage platform, or are there limits on how often you can upload&#x2F;download data? If I can SSH into it at any time, why not use this over other storage providers?
评论 #32748210 未加载
评论 #32748571 未加载
rsyncover 2 years ago
Wow - this came and went on the front page of HN yesterday and we had no idea.<p>Thank you to everyone for your kind words - I will personally look over the discussion thread today, a day late, and see if there are any questions I can answer.
评论 #32767965 未加载
评论 #32756940 未加载
epitradeover 2 years ago
Thank you rsync.net -- the zfs filesystem &#x2F; managed service from a team that administers their own hardware give me peace of mind knowing my customers data (which is champion nowadays) is safe.<p>Look forward to using you more!
quickthrower2over 2 years ago
Sweet! I wanted &#x2F; wondered if this exists. Feels a bit pricey for my home backup usecase though. Maybe I am spoiled by the cheap backup options!
评论 #32748554 未加载
评论 #32748312 未加载
KingOfCodersover 2 years ago
Huge fan of Rsync, excellent support, great product.
评论 #32748469 未加载
lloydatkinsonover 2 years ago
Looks interesting but the pricing is confusing.<p>0.99 cents requires 680GB minimum but the 0.1 cents does not have a minimum.
评论 #32748320 未加载
评论 #32748361 未加载
egorfineover 2 years ago
Looks offline from Ukraine
tunnuzover 2 years ago
Looks offline to me