r/chess largely tore this analysis apart.<p>> TL;DR: The person who made this video fucked up by using the wrong tool, and with a terrible premise did a lot of work. They don't even show their work. The parameters which Chessbase used to come up with its number are not necessarily the parameters this video's author used, and engine parameters and depth certainly matter. In any case it's not even the anti-cheat analysis that is LITERALLY IN THE SOFTWARE that they could have used instead.<p><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/xnv9r9/comment/ipwapd6/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/xnv9r9/comment/ipwap...</a><p><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/xnv9r9/comment/ipw3eyb/" rel="nofollow">https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/xnv9r9/comment/ipw3e...</a>