TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

How California’s Bullet Train Went Off the Rails

43 pointsby phillyphamover 2 years ago

7 comments

_fat_santaover 2 years ago
Big infrastructure projects I feel like is where America&#x27;s democratic system starts to fall apart, and we honestly need a better solution.<p>It seems that in the US we want both good infrastructure but also to have out hands and inputs in every project. We all need to collectively understand that you can have one or the other but not both. That new rail project may not go down the exact route you want but realize that if you start suggesting changes, it will never go down the route you want because it will never be built.<p>This rail project could have been completed years ago if political leaders didn&#x27;t always change the plan to benefit themselves.
评论 #33141024 未加载
评论 #33141928 未加载
评论 #33146744 未加载
评论 #33145236 未加载
评论 #33145212 未加载
phillyphamover 2 years ago
Unlocked link: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2022&#x2F;10&#x2F;09&#x2F;us&#x2F;california-high-speed-rail-politics.html?unlocked_article_code=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACEIPuonUktbfqYhlSFUbCibIRp8spxmHi__Vxr01w3__IyjQUi5PwuhQGYGB_wLVYq5ie9o4xHKbWNpFevcJdcBF89V-bQZrWhX65dyNgogEKCE47tm6B2o9hZmRGO1nqTKvM2DlcaIvyrGx-k-NaDXtWaTb0HIgcx134scwLSHc0nAJzqnHGuZ3y4M-ia9nXsYmMG9GMCqavPDoCAF9OcGEZnzf6go2WuJfXlLDjILWquJAIEgJVwWwHD4o6n086dhcJNsVIK3-ShYjc8H8irgVYXd6ZcZOp95qMNxAUGj-LjYmmQ" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2022&#x2F;10&#x2F;09&#x2F;us&#x2F;california-high-speed-...</a>
评论 #33140098 未加载
评论 #33140078 未加载
评论 #33140099 未加载
rayinerover 2 years ago
&gt; Only now, though, is it becoming apparent how costly the political choices have been. Collectively, they turned a project that might have been built more quickly and cheaply into a behemoth so expensive that, without a major new source of funding, there is little chance it can ever reach its original goal of connecting California’s two biggest metropolitan areas in two hours and 40 minutes.<p>I received some good advice a long time ago, which is that don’t spend too much time beating your head over your weaknesses, because then you’ll be spending your life focusing on what you’re bad at instead of what you’re good at.<p>I feel like Americans should do this about trains and transit. We can’t do it. Just let it go. Find some other outlet that harnesses our strengths as a society instead of playing into all of our weaknesses.
评论 #33145299 未加载
egberts1over 2 years ago
There is always that available $54 billion surplus of the California state government budget.<p>#headduck
Gunaxover 2 years ago
Even it&#x27;s opponents, underestimated the cost. We knew it would never be $10 billion. It&#x27;s rare that a boondoggle is such a doggle that even the opponents underestimated how much of a budget overrun it would be.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dilanesper.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;people-who-draw-lines-on-maps-are" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dilanesper.substack.com&#x2F;p&#x2F;people-who-draw-lines-on-m...</a>
robomartinover 2 years ago
This kind of thing is what, to me, puts into doubt the idea of a full migration to electric ground transportation in anything less than a scale that could range between fifty and one hundred years.<p>We need to <i>double</i> our power generation and transportation infrastructure before full electric transportation is possible.<p>We can&#x27;t build anything at scale any more. The CA high speed train started as a ten billion dollar promise. It quickly became $33 billion. Now it is at over $110 billion and no idea of when or if it will be completed. I would not be surprised if it ends-up somewhere between $250 to $500 billion dollars. People will work on this thing their entire lives, retire and die before it is finished.<p>Cost overruns and what is indistinguishable from systemic incompetence means we cannot possibly afford both the time and cost of doubling our entire power infrastructure in support of electric transportation. In other words, before we can dream of such things and approach large projects, we have to fix the cultural, bureaucratic and structural problems this nation has.<p>BTW, for all his faults, Trump was the first US President to seriously engaged in some of this work. I don&#x27;t remember all the details. I do remember reading about such things as the permits and process to build a road or bridge being reduced from decades to perhaps a few years. We are in desperate need of more work on this front.<p>Today electric vehicles exist in this gray area where they don&#x27;t demand enough electricity to create serious problem most of the time. Here in CA we&#x27;ve already have the government ask electric car owners to alter charging behavior due to power grid problems. At some point we will start to approach various thresholds that will make electric vehicles very problematic without matching infrastructure enhancement at local, city, regional, state and national levels.<p>Not sure we can make that happen. We can&#x27;t have every project cost ten times more than planned and take ten times longer to complete. That&#x27;s not a formula for success at all.
评论 #33144328 未加载
评论 #33143296 未加载
ncmncmover 2 years ago
Article misses the point that the cost and schedule overruns are really the whole point of the project. A project&#x27;s nominal purpose -- train, tunnel, nuke plant -- is just there to fend off pressure to pull the plug. Sunk-cost fallacy keeps the money coming.<p>Solar and wind megaprojects seem to avoid this fate by a combination of easy accounting -- unit cost x total units = expected cost -- and incremental delivery -- they can start delivering power almost immediately, both demonstrating progress and helping fund further work. Those that fail to deliver early and on-budget are easier to cancel. (Cancelled big solar and wind projects are called failures, but are successes of project management; and equipment can often be sold on to other projects.)<p>For most big infrastructure projects, nobody really knows how much it <i>ought to</i> cost at each stage, or how far along it really is. The stakeholders who gave it the OK expect a piece of the action, continuously. They never want the money flow to cease, which would happen on completion.<p>America&#x27;s innovation is that the corrupt money flows to stakeholders are <i>wholly legal</i>, with no risk of indictment. This makes it easier to start projects, even though harder to finish them. The people promoting the project can&#x27;t afford to buy off gatekeepers, but the project budget itself can. The bigger it is, though, the more backers it will need, so it is easier to estimate low, and overrun.<p>Sometimes, if the money will be cut off anyway, it can be face-saving to deliver something at that point. Thus, Olkiluoto, Second Avenue, and Bay Bridge. NASA is required by law to buy a new, useless SLS every time they shoot one, but can delay launching pretty easily. The sooner SpaceX SuperHeavy starts launching cans, the sooner the obligation might be lifted. Expect to see a big new missile program approved immediately after that.<p>Thing is, most things somebody would like government to spend $billions on really shouldn&#x27;t be built. So we need gatekeepers. And, some should be, so they need to be overcome sometimes.