fascinating: <a href="https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+repo:%5Egithub%5C.com/ProtonVPN/android-app%24+stealth&patternType=standard" rel="nofollow">https://sourcegraph.com/search?q=context:global+repo:%5Egith...</a> implies it's "Wireguard over TLS" which unfortunately seems to have existing precedent: <a href="https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=wireguard+tls&ia=web" rel="nofollow">https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=wireguard+tls&ia=web</a><p>Anyway, it sure is misleading to say "We designed our Stealth protocol from the ground up to not have these issues." when it appears to be standing on the shoulders of Wireguard. I'm <i>glad</i> they didn't roll their on VPN protocol quite literally from scratch, because "don't roll your own crypto," but this messaging could do with some clarity (and a less SEO opaque name, IMHO)