"I've learned something that utterly astonished me when I first recognized it: with rare exceptions, entrepreneurs in general are not curious people."<p>I have met hundreds of entrepreneurs at Bootstrappers Breakfasts over the last years and this description and taxonomy bears no relationship to my experience.
The title alone is enough to tell that this article will be trash (and it is). Founders are regular people, and regular people are founders.<p>Some founders are irregular people and some irregular people are founders.<p>Being a founder is not somehow a class above, any more than being a politician, a soldier, a cop, or whatever else. We may <i>afford</i> such people greater status, but they are just regular people with a particular career.
I got to be honest, this whole thing of the 'founders' persona is utter bull. I have met many, and know many very well and they tend to be all sorts.
What a shitty post. 41 lines of shit.<p>Like "entrepreneurs" (whatever the author makes as a definition) are fundamentally not "regular people" (whatever the author etc.). What kings can learn from peons ? Everything, kings know nothing and rely on other people to do everything. They only have the means (the money) to motivate them.<p>Shit we all lost 5mn.