That one<p><a href="https://treevis.net/#Li2020a" rel="nofollow">https://treevis.net/#Li2020a</a><p>or that one<p><a href="https://treevis.net/#Brath2012" rel="nofollow">https://treevis.net/#Brath2012</a><p>look useful for seeing 6 million simultaneous messages in exchange, the salient content peculiar to you you rewire as strands in zero gravity depending on emphasis and the A.I. assistant has AST extrapolations at focal points
I don't think anything will top the squarified treemap for me, but I love this page.<p>I really don't get the appeal of the sunburst style visualizations. They seem like the worst possible use of area to [fail to] convey information.<p>I think I agree with arboles that a tree visualization wouldn't be appropriate for this page. However, this reminds me of an old idea I had, to present tree-based data structures in a tree. I was thinking something like a phylogenetic tree representing the evolution of these data structures over time. Too much of a research project for me though.
Of course this begs the question why they aren't represented by some sort of tree visualization.<p><pre><code> Tree visualization is one of the best-studied areas of information visualization; researchers have developed more than 200 visualization and layout techniques for trees. The treevis.net project aims to provide a hand-curated bibliographical reference to this ever-growing wealth of techniques. It offers a visual overview that users can filter to a desired subset along the design criteria of dimensionality, edge representation, and node alignment. Details, including links to the original publications, can be brought up on demand. Treevis.net has become a community effort, with researchers sending in preprints of their tree visualization techniques to be published or pointing out additional information.
</code></pre>
-- Site itself is a paper (<a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6056510" rel="nofollow">https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6056510</a>)<p>Very interesting. I especially like the filtering and the older examples. Too bad most are behind paywalls.<p>Edit: Somebody else had the same thought heh.<p>Bunch of other types of visualization collections in the dropdown top-left. Appears to be suffering from link rot.<p>OP any backstory?
Has there been a study of how well any of these work in VR ? I'd like to know which ones are intuitive and comfortable for navigating with hand motions and viewer teleportation.
Unlike the other comments, I don't think the site about tree organizations should be organized like a tree. The authors are well read in tree visualizations, in the site you can filter by "Dimensionality" or "Representation" or "Alignment", and you can <i>combine</i> these tags. The authors don't use trees because they know the limitations.<p>This reply isn't filed under the intended two posts it should reference because of limitations of how comments are structured on HN.