A frighteningly large number of companies being garbage at onboarding is a problem that existed long before remote work, easy to blame a failed onboard on remote work but I've seen it happen so many times in-person long before 2020.<p>If anything I'd say its likely that really embracing remote work instead of half-assing it would probably improve onboarding for most companies since you'd assume the situation would at least cause a smart company to produce a clear and standardized process, instead of leaving it mostly to fate which is how onboarding has historically been done in-office at a LOT of tech companies pre-COVID.<p>As a counter anecdote to the one presented in the blog post: the game company Bungie shipped 2 major game releases (with a third arriving in Feb) for Destiny 2 and are working on at least 2 unknown new games while expanding the company by hundreds of employees during COVID. Earlier this year as many companies began to issue Return to Office mandates they announced they will be shifting to "Digital-First" and expanding the amount of fully remote job hires. They've absolutely thrived in an industry where both highly technical and creative workforces are required despite a huge shift to remote work (and were acquired by Sony for 3.6 billion dollars earlier this year).
> <i>Does the team have regular offsites and team building activities? When is the next one? Don’t take a wishy-washy, “There’s a budget for team building” answer. You deserve to get to know your teammates.</i><p>> <i>Do I have to schedule meetings for discussions or are employees expected to be online at all times? At an earlier consulting role, I had given my team a single Google Meet link where everyone was expected to hang out at all times when they were not doing deep work. This idea became so popular that the link eventually got a nickname and other teams knew to just pop in to ask questions. This link truly was a virtual office for the team.</i><p>This sounds like a nightmare. The only takeaway I got from this article is to avoid any company that the OP has consulted for.
The article doesn't really support the headline. Or at least no more than if the entirety of the body said "some companies are bad at remote."