TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Roger Penrose: “Consciousness must be beyond computable physics”

17 pointsby jerryjerryjerryover 2 years ago

6 comments

aapplebyover 2 years ago
My money is on the other end of the spectrum - Any sufficiently large chunk of linear algebra and activation functions is indistinguishable from consciousness. ;)
评论 #33633553 未加载
Pixie_Dustover 2 years ago
What exactly did Penrose say. Seems to me the New Ageists over at New Scientist are about promoting quantum wooism in the vein of Deepak Chopra.
thinkmcflyover 2 years ago
Trust can be tough when really smart people can get things so wrong
评论 #33635628 未加载
评论 #33631789 未加载
m-p-3over 2 years ago
Posted yesterday<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33607695" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=33607695</a>
gctover 2 years ago
But it is computable because we compute it...
评论 #33631052 未加载
pencilguinover 2 years ago
This has to be the silliest thing he has promoted, unless he is saying that (e.g.) quantum physics will not end up being computable. Consciousness as implemented relies on cellular processes, some of which necessarily involve quantum phenomena. It is funny to single out consciousness from among myriad other sorts of biological activity and behavior.
评论 #33628664 未加载