TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The Stupidest Answer In The World

27 pointsby ksvsover 16 years ago

6 comments

raganwaldover 16 years ago
Tangentially, I find myself in the mainstream about Twitter. I tried it for a few weeks and couldn't figure out what it was for, what was <i>actionable</i> (my favourite word from my go-go thirties) about it. It felt like Facebook status updates with wimpy group chat on a quad short espresso.<p>Which made me feel old. Whenever throngs of people love something and I can't figure out what it's for, I immediately think of mainframe programmers sking what on Earth anyone would ever want to do with an 8 bit microprocessor, a couple of K of memory, and a paper tape reader.
评论 #337301 未加载
评论 #337158 未加载
评论 #337169 未加载
评论 #337439 未加载
run4yourlivesover 16 years ago
<i>It is not the stupidest question in the world. It's a terribly important question. But I don't think it's the most important question facing Twitter right now. Twitter has yet to cross the chasm to mainstream usage. It's not immediately obvious to anyone why they should use Twitter</i><p>See this is why I have a problem with the "get big and everything else will happen" philosophy that so many in the valley share: It's twisted logic.<p>If a startup can't make money now, then yes, it's possible that they might make money later. That's sounds more like trying to win the lottery twice though. Odds are it won't happen. In fact, Google is the <i>only</i> time it's happened that I can think of off hand.<p>Now, if a startup can turn a profit from the start (or soon enough) then it is pretty much guaranteed to continue making that profit no matter how big it is. In fact, <i>it doesn't even need to get bigger</i>. It can if it chooses, but it doesn't have to.<p>Why do people continue to focus on the bubble mentality of trying to profit from popularity alone? Even when it works, it isn't sustainable.
评论 #337441 未加载
fallentimesover 16 years ago
Wow - cheers to Fred for admitting his mistake. It takes balls to do this, let alone blog about it to thousands of people.
Hexstreamover 16 years ago
I'm dead-<i>blazé</i> about the Twitter "controversies". It's like an endless stream of always the <i>same</i> praises and complaints, questions and answers, positive and negative outlooks. Can we please move on?
Prrometheusover 16 years ago
It's interesting that anecdotes about Obama have entered into the popular consciousness as parables in the same way that was once reserved for stories of Jesus or Buddha.
评论 #337444 未加载
matt1over 16 years ago
Can someone explain what was so stupid about his answer? I don't understand.
评论 #337351 未加载
评论 #337181 未加载