The headline here, is a bit out of line with the described contents. It sounds more like, "if you are a central bank that thinks there's any chance of being sanctioned by the West, you might want to put some into Bitcoin, although gold is better if you can get enough". Considerably more nuanced.<p>Also, the described purpose of the paper was, 'how much of a risk to the dollar is the use of sanctions?', for which you first need to game out, from the point of view of a central bank, whether or not buying Bitcoin is a good idea.<p>All interesting stuff, but not much like the description of "Harvard paper to central banks: Buy Bitoin". But then, I suppose "Harvard paper describes why some central banks might have an incentive to buy Bitcoin", doesn't get as many clicks?