Immediately posting a tweet without my say-so? For shame. An abuse of trust in this day in age and a reason I <i>hate</i> Twitter/Facebook universal sign-ins. Access revoked. Goodbye.
We previously launched a client-side only proof of concept, that would show the potential of the idea.<p>When the launch was successful we started building the proper version, with usernames, curation (hiding of posts) and proper OAuth.<p>Previous launch post is here: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3109779" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3109779</a>
I only get the past 1 week of posts, so for me it's just like loading my Facebook page (but with less info and a poorer ui): <a href="http://citricsquid.screensnarp.com/dx5xbb.png" rel="nofollow">http://citricsquid.screensnarp.com/dx5xbb.png</a><p>is that broken or intentional? username citricsquid.
"Latest Kiwis"?<p>How about the 4 million domestic and the 1 million expat people who are New Zealanders and who already call ourselves Kiwis?<p>To us this is like saying "latest Aussies" or "Latest Texans" or "latest Russians". It sounds stupid and is borderline offensive.<p>Please call yourself something else.
So...what's the target audience here? I know it seems self evident that everyone is just dying for another way to show what they've been sharing online...but it seems that the people who want to share a lot will be satisfied with Facebook and G+, both of which give greater granularity for privacy than does this.