This journalist seems outraged that Netflix is hosting non-factual content. Hard to comport this with 90% of the content on the platform, which is clearly non-factual.<p>In any case, Hancock is presenting a theory, to which there may well be elements of interest to merit further investigation. As for 'Big Archaeology' - entrenched interests prepared to defend privilege is a standard characteristic of any type of gated social organisation, it is not a crazy conspiracy to point this out.
“Why has this been allowed?”<p>Another “journalist” struggling to understand why any thought, topic, or piece of content that they haven’t personally blessed has made its way into the public psyche.