TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Min: A fast, minimal browser that protects your privacy

188 pointsby aaossaover 2 years ago

40 comments

gwn7over 2 years ago
Fast, efficient, and battery-friendly browser... So far so good. Based on Electron... What?<p>How can it be possible for an Electron based browser to be faster &#x2F; more efficient &#x2F; battery-friendlier than the other mainstream ones?<p>Sounds like bullshit. We need to see some benchmarks.
评论 #33985393 未加载
hestefiskover 2 years ago
Every time I see a new browser with privacy features announced, I get hopeful it’s actually something new. Until I discover it’s another Chromium fork with a different skin. I really wish Servo hadn’t died. Until then, I’ll stick with FF.
tiffanyhover 2 years ago
Don’t forgot about <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;librewolf.net&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;librewolf.net&#x2F;</a><p>It’s Firefox with every privacy setting turned to max.
评论 #33984679 未加载
评论 #33985043 未加载
评论 #33991412 未加载
评论 #33984232 未加载
评论 #33988066 未加载
thunderbongover 2 years ago
Everyone&#x27;s comparing this to a regular browser. But since it&#x27;s electron based, I&#x27;m just wondering whether this could be a path to creating a really good browser for development. As of now, most of the debugging that&#x27;s done on browsers are either based on the tools provided by the browser itself, or via extensions and add-ons.<p>I just hope, this kind of paves the way for developers themselves to add features and capabilities.<p>Other browsers in this space - Polypane[0], Sizzy[1], Blisk[2]<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;polypane.app&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;polypane.app&#x2F;</a> [1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sizzy.co" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sizzy.co</a> [2]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blisk.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blisk.io</a>
评论 #33985066 未加载
评论 #33987628 未加载
jefftkover 2 years ago
Whenever a new browser is announced my first question is if it&#x27;s a new engine, and if not, what engine is it a UI for?<p>In this case it turns out to be built on Electron, which uses the Blink (Chrome&#x27;s) rendering engine.
DrSarezover 2 years ago
&quot;a fast, minimal browser [...] written entirely with CSS and JavaScript using Electron&quot; - That sounds like an oxymoron to me.
评论 #33984086 未加载
rexreedover 2 years ago
If you want fast and minimal, give Lynx a try. The original fast, minimal, privacy protected browser: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lynx.invisible-island.net&#x2F;current&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lynx.invisible-island.net&#x2F;current&#x2F;</a>
评论 #33984243 未加载
评论 #33984124 未加载
评论 #33984677 未加载
评论 #33983972 未加载
toygover 2 years ago
I just use FF and leave the stock OS browser (typically Edge or Safari) &quot;clean&quot;, ready for those battery-saving times.<p>The other day I only had a 20W laptop charger, which I know is only enough to slow down battery discharge with FF; used Edge, and the battery actually <i>charged</i> significantly. Same experiences I had with Safari. I&#x27;ll keep using Firefox, because it&#x27;s good for the ecosystem, but when battery is an issue, I switch.
callumprenticeover 2 years ago
The Ladybird bowser - part of the Serenity OS - is another alternative I’m following with a mixture of astonishment, admiration and excitement - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;awesomekling.github.io&#x2F;Ladybird-a-new-cross-platform-browser-project&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;awesomekling.github.io&#x2F;Ladybird-a-new-cross-platform...</a><p>I suspect that for most people, it still has a way to go before it could be considered a daily driver, but the rate of progress is incredible and I’m sure it will get there.
评论 #34002622 未加载
评论 #33990508 未加载
amadeuspagelover 2 years ago
I installed it (yes you can install this right away, the download button doesn&#x27;t lead you to some signup form!) and played with it a bit.<p>It&#x27;s beautiful, but I feel that chrome has a better beauty&#x2F;functionality tradeoff. Some differences vs chrome I noted:<p>— no favicons<p>— no addressbar<p>— no skeuomorphic tabs<p>All these things make it look more beautiful and elegant then chrome, but less functional.
评论 #33984474 未加载
评论 #33990918 未加载
NunoSempereover 2 years ago
Recently I&#x27;ve been playing with Rose, which is a small GTK+Webkit project that I&#x27;ve found really nice to hack on [1]. Src: &lt;<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mini-rose&#x2F;rose" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;mini-rose&#x2F;rose</a>&gt;<p>[1]. And I&#x27;m in fact typing this from within it.
pipeline_peakover 2 years ago
I hate to be egotistical, I’m sure like many people before me, I had the idea of a reader only browser.<p>Of course I never came through with the idea because well…look how much unpaid work goes into it.<p>As others have said, I don’t think Electron is well suited for anything to be resource friendly. I think it’s well suited for apps on machines that can afford to run Electron, not something as general purpose as a browser.<p>Writing a browser is very hard, but something done in reader mode is clearly more feasible. I wanted to marry FreeText with Gumbo, OpenGL and C++. Maybe even throw in a built in RSS reader that displays the stripped pages. but I have no idea how to get FreeText working with OpenGL.<p>I think if I could achieve this, I could get something that’s truly lightweight.
评论 #33990472 未加载
bee_riderover 2 years ago
I liked suckles surf (which at least uses webkit2 rather than being yet another chrome). But in the end, the web is too complicated for simple tools, something like Firefox with extensions and stuff to handle downloaded files is pretty helpful.<p>It seems quite unfortunate that such large programs are required to handle current web standards. Anything useful could be expressed as text in plain old html, but then, all the bloat needs to be there to pay the bills I guess.
therealmarvover 2 years ago
Stay away if you value your security. Nothing personally against Electron but a browser is (or can be) exposed to all kinds of sites which do not have your best interest in mind. You really want always the latest security updates and a browser with a strong security concept (sandbox, encapsulation, taking advantage OS security etc) which is not the aim of Electron afaik.
评论 #33988050 未加载
wendyshuover 2 years ago
There needs to be a word for these projects that are a UI layer on top of a preexisting browser engine. Calling it a &quot;new browser&quot; is a little confusing.
评论 #33993463 未加载
sprkwdover 2 years ago
Out of the new, new wave of browsers, I&#x27;m actually enjoying Arc browser at the moment.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arc.net" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arc.net</a>
评论 #33984079 未加载
评论 #33984042 未加载
评论 #33984153 未加载
评论 #33983831 未加载
评论 #33984173 未加载
评论 #33989519 未加载
marosgregoover 2 years ago
Some truly minimal browser: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.netsurf-browser.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.netsurf-browser.org</a>
评论 #33984473 未加载
RubyRidgeRandyover 2 years ago
I tried this out for a little bit. Looks very clean.<p>I had these issues and suggestions:<p>- Set min to dark mode, but it made no difference. Restarted to no avail.<p>- Set all ads to be blocked, still saw a lot of ads on reddit, youtube, others.<p>- Design wise, I think the app should default to having borders between tabs.<p>- There should be more white space at the top to drag the window around. The app opened maximized and when I went to drag it on windows I could only click the the URL bar because there is only a little bit of padding inbetween it and the top of the window.<p>- I have a large monitor and the when you click on the url bar when you have multiple tabs open, it expands to the full window width so the text you were looking at moves all the way to the left, very nitpicky I know, but I think this is not a great design choice and maybe the text should stay where it is when changing sites.
bityardover 2 years ago
From reading the headline, I was hopeful that this would be one of my most desired apps that doesn&#x27;t exist yet: a browser that renders pages in Reader Mode, but all the time.<p>Unfortunately this is just a regular browser with &quot;minimal&quot; only meaning practically no UI.
评论 #33988421 未加载
评论 #33987539 未加载
incanus77over 2 years ago
I am a longtime very “Mac person” and don’t like non-Cocoa &#x2F; standard Mac UI apps, but I used Min for a long while. I went back to Safari once Cloud Tabs stabilized, but Min is just incredibly lean, fast, and reliable. Big fan — and I may yet go back!
deliriumchnover 2 years ago
Honestly hard to believe that its a power efficiency focused browser when it uses electron and chromium.<p>Besides that, I really enjoy the surge of browsers in last few years, we got orion, min, arc and I guess few more I missed
graderjsover 2 years ago
It would be cool if there was a &quot;reference implementation&quot; of the W3C specs on HTML, CSS, JavaScript etc, that was untethered to a particular megacorporation &#x2F; browser-vendor &#x2F; ideology &#x2F; stance on privacy &#x2F; insert other potentially divisive fracture line here ... and fully open source.<p>Then folks could &quot;plug them in&quot; as libraries to their app &#x2F; custom browser, and go to town adding all the custom ad and spyware or privacy and freedum preserving defenses they like.<p>Surely a committed group of open sourcers on GitHub could achieve this.
columnover 2 years ago
Moving the window is harder than it should be, the main tab takes all the width therefore you have to aim on top of it but not to high... Altdrag to the request, but still rather frustrating
dangover 2 years ago
Related:<p><i>Min – A smarter web browser</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15429286" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=15429286</a> - Oct 2017 (72 comments)<p><i>Show HN: Min – web browser with better search and built-in ad blocking</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11484770" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11484770</a> - April 2016 (91 comments)
tholdemover 2 years ago
One reason why mainstream web browsers are slow and &quot;bulky&quot; and use a lot of RAM is that they use all sorts of different exploit mitigation and hardening techniques.<p>One can only wonder what these alternatives do when they claim to be minimal and fast and worse, private. Can there really be privacy without security?
dfexover 2 years ago
Feels very snappy, but for me it&#x27;s a non-starter: rejects connection to any site with a self-signed certificate, with no apparent means of override.<p>I get the security stance, but I configure a LOT of networking hardware via WebUI (eg: Palo Alto firewalls - self-signed from the factory) and this makes it next to useless.
ryanianianover 2 years ago
&gt; Or search through the full text of every page you&#x27;ve visited, even if you don&#x27;t remember the title.<p>Is that a feature of the underlying browser engine or an addon? I&#x27;ve wanted that for years but maybe not enough to fiddle with an entirely new browser app.
评论 #33983643 未加载
评论 #33983623 未加载
benrapscallionover 2 years ago
FWIW, I love Lynx on my Mac, especially for ad-heavy websites. I miss the &quot;in browser&quot; services that brow.sh [1] used to provide.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.brow.sh" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.brow.sh</a>
评论 #33984325 未加载
miklover 2 years ago
Looks nice, but since they can’t be bothered to get the Mac app properly signed, I can’t be bothered to try it.<p>Sorry, but with the malware threat level being what it is, getting the app signatures right is table stakes.
nothrowawaysover 2 years ago
I like the minimalist UI, it should be a default other browsers too.
lopkeny12koover 2 years ago
&gt; browser that protects your privacy<p>It&#x27;s Chromium under the hood. No thanks.
mackrevinackover 2 years ago
tried this recently but like most alternative browsers, if it doesnt have support for ublock or dark reader then im usually back to firefox after a day or so.<p>theres also another extension that i cant think of the name. it adds the url to the title of the window so that keepass&#x2F;autotype can detect what site it is.<p>i have a few other extensions but i would be willing to forego them if the browser was that good
posharmaover 2 years ago
All software products start like this - minimal, less memory, etc. Wait for a few months and things go south. Sorry, doesn’t excite me.
ThinkBeatover 2 years ago
Would this mean that the browser gets security updates far slower than Chromium itself?<p>Or is Electron updates as frequently?
nalekberovover 2 years ago
Browser running in browser, not bad, not bad at all.
xnaclyover 2 years ago
A browser in electron? At this point just use chromium - makes no difference.<p>Anyway, use firefox or librewolf. Stop enabling the chromium monopoly!
评论 #33986306 未加载
评论 #33984222 未加载
评论 #33988188 未加载
评论 #33985175 未加载
评论 #33983934 未加载
评论 #33987747 未加载
评论 #33983785 未加载
评论 #33984840 未加载
jmondiover 2 years ago
Everyone is complaining it is built in electron, and it is a browser running a browser. Brave is also built on electron and is also a browser running a browser.
评论 #33983708 未加载
评论 #33983957 未加载
评论 #33983796 未加载
Maursaultover 2 years ago
Which OS <i>versions</i> are supported?
评论 #33983786 未加载
sshineover 2 years ago
Electron, WebKit, nope.<p>Kudos for experimenting with minimalism!<p>But this is not the alternative to Firefox I&#x27;ve been looking for.
评论 #33983911 未加载
评论 #33984009 未加载
wereallterrristover 2 years ago
Just... give Firefox a shot people. Please: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;81OpEOy.png" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;i.imgur.com&#x2F;81OpEOy.png</a>
评论 #33986060 未加载
评论 #33985063 未加载
评论 #33984873 未加载
评论 #33985914 未加载
评论 #33987503 未加载
评论 #33989515 未加载
评论 #33985372 未加载