TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Ask HN: Selectively Refusing Anonymous Interactions?

1 pointsby killermouse0over 2 years ago
I appreciate the freedom of speech that anonymity on the internet can allow. However, for content creators for example, I can see the value in engaging only with people who have provided their real identity, perhaps through a KYC process, mainly to reduce spam and increase safety.<p>Do you think social media platforms should allow you to require this level of identity verification, possibly through a checkbox like &quot;accessible only to people who have completed KYC&quot;. Assuming this would be backed by regulations of some sort?

2 comments

082349872349872over 2 years ago
I&#x27;m not too into &quot;real identity&quot;[0], but since I tend to manually filter by handles which have passed my personal[1] Turing Test (&quot;has this handle presented ideas and defended them via logic and evidence?&quot;), I would daydream about a checkbox like &quot;no bots, non-heart-transplanted dogs[2], or low-engagement humans&quot;.<p>[0] despite which I&#x27;ve already easily leaked 33+ bits for this handle. Anonymity theatre is much easier than anonymity.<p>[1] I do seem to fail others&#x27; Turing Tests from time to time, so YMMV.<p>[2] cf «Собачье сердце»
anenefanover 2 years ago
Only if search engines agreed not to (read never) provide any web results from an identity who was using whatever means to be an anonyphobe (even at a low threshold like 1% of the time) at a website or social media service.