TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Would you use 'Hacker News for books'?

8 pointsby sasha_fishterover 2 years ago
I had pretty successful topic about books the other day<p>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=34309671<p>And my mind just can&#x27;t stop thinking about project &#x27;Hacker News for books&#x27;. I know that reddit has r&#x2F;books, but I would like to have a clean UI&#x2F;UX like HN.<p>Whare are your thougts?

7 comments

rchaudover 2 years ago
HN&#x27;s UX depends heavily on quality moderation that persists over the long term, thereby encouraging the thoughtful discussion to become the norm.<p>A single-category site about books is also not necessarily going to attract the same breadth of voices as HN can.
jonahbentonover 2 years ago
I wouldn&#x27;t read too much into the success of that one thread, but 20 years after &quot;if you like this you might like that because&quot; systems first appeared for movies, music, books, I personally remain frustrated that...this is still not an effectively solved problem. I continue to need human curators- Tyler Cowen being an astonishing prolific source for both books and music, but people I follow on Twitter before its implosion being a solid source as well- and&#x2F;or to actually read&#x2F;listen to a good sample myself, which takes professional level time and attention, which I cannot devote to a leisure activity. A chatgpt like dialogue- I liked x, y aspects of z content, suggest one to me, etc- seems achievable now. Cheers.
rishikeshsover 2 years ago
For your reference: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hackernewsbooks.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hackernewsbooks.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #34342495 未加载
kingkongjaffaover 2 years ago
I want an up to date version of <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lesswrong.com&#x2F;posts&#x2F;xg3hXCYQPJkwHyik2&#x2F;the-best-textbooks-on-every-subject" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lesswrong.com&#x2F;posts&#x2F;xg3hXCYQPJkwHyik2&#x2F;the-best-t...</a><p>there&#x27;s also this, which I just found: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lesswrong.com&#x2F;posts&#x2F;GiEdQ79EDMjggtBKf&#x2F;best-non-textbooks-on-every-subject" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lesswrong.com&#x2F;posts&#x2F;GiEdQ79EDMjggtBKf&#x2F;best-non-t...</a>
mejutocoover 2 years ago
The first question I have is: how is it different from goodreads?
评论 #34342481 未加载
HardwareLustover 2 years ago
I like the idea, but what&#x27;s going to stop it from devolving into the lowest common denominator like r&#x2F;books did years ago?
评论 #34342490 未加载
McNuttyover 2 years ago
Visit &#x2F;r&#x2F;books using old.reddit.com
评论 #34350520 未加载