TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Basecamp details $3.2M bill that saw it quit cloud

17 pointsby vanburenover 2 years ago

4 comments

jackhalfordover 2 years ago
In a pre-cloud world you want cpu utilization. In a post cloud world you cou utilization high. The mindset doesn’t seem to be shifting… I’d bet their cpu utilization is sub 10%<p>&gt; Reserved Instances and committed usage, as part of a Private Pricing Agreement,&quot; he wrote. &quot;This is a highly optimized budget.&quot;<p>Maybe the commitments are optimized, but definitely not the compute as they are running RoR
mlhpdxover 2 years ago
No matter what ends up said about the reasons, blaming vendors is a bad sign. AWS pricing is formulaic, and being “shocked” by it is an admission of being asleep at the wheel.
girafffe_iover 2 years ago
Could you estimate cost savings with a faster language rewrite?<p>Based on the programming language energy usage benchmark, Java is 32x faster than RoR.<p>Let&#x27;s say you could you replace 32 instances with Java, that might help with the reserved instance coat as well.
hindsightbiasover 2 years ago
I’d wager his servers were all running at 20% utilization.