This, like a recent article about electricity production from dedicated biomass, seems to be railing very strongly, and in weirdly detailed depth, against a future which no-one is actually planning for.<p>Should I be suspicious when an article argues that "thing no one is planning on doing" is worse than fossil fuels, that they're really supporting the fossil fuel industry?<p>They seem unaware that Green Hydrogen is poised to replace fossil inputs in fertilizer and other petrochemical usages.