> “I would really love to reconnect and see if there’s a way for us to have a constructive relationship,
use each other as resources when possible, or at least vet things with each other.”<p>Sending that to a witness using Signal's disappearing messages does sound like tampering. Here's hoping he gets more strict bond limitations and an obstruction conviction for this, he earned it.
This is why he should never have been given bail - a sophisticated schemer that has an answer for everything and never gives up<p>At least we might yet find out who paid said bail cough marc cough
This gentleman is playing another game. And it's one of the bored elites. How much outrageous $^^#&$#&^ can I get away with, before a court lands me in jail. So far he is winning 5-0 if we talk soccer terms.
Honestly if their case depends on "he said, she said" testimony then SBF is going to be found not guilty.<p>I personally applauded the "soft" msm interviews with SBF as everything he does when given free reign, including these messages only makes things worse for him. They would be better placed letting him attempt witness tampering and who knows where it might lead.
This seems like a reach by the government. He is currently innocent and has the right to prepare a defense. Claiming that everyone other than immediate family is a potential witness seems like a stretch, the kind that ends up with a mistrial.