TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

A 4 point plan to save Yahoo

13 pointsby jdavidover 16 years ago
Since moving to the valley I have begun to appreciate what Yahoo! is to the web. When I was young I might have seen yahoo as a search engine or a competitor to AOL, and even today Yahoo holds some of the coolest companies like Delicious, and Flickr. Yahoo, unlike Microsoft and Google has a simple brand, a brand that people like and a brand that people know. Their brand is like internet gold, almost a Disney of sorts for internet content, and that is their problem. Disney is a world wide brand but today, they find themselves competing head to head with other animation studios, like Yahoo! tries to compete with Google, if only Yahoo! would stop trying to compete with Google on PageRank, they might actually do well. Yahoo needs to work with what they have, 1 billion users, a friendly and trustworthy brand, and access to some of the webs most innovative startups. Microsoft knows this and arguably wanted to buy Yahoo!s eyeballs and brand, so we know that is Yahoo’s value, but maybe Yahoo has more?<p>So to help Yahoo capitalize on what it has I have a few things I would try.<p>1. Re monetize Flickr.<p>There are several photo sites that earn more revenue per user than Flickr, sites like SmugMug. SmugMug and Flickr differ in that SmugMug enables an ecosystem of photographers to earn a living, where Flickr is more of a sharing site. Flickr has more in common with Wikipedia, and to follow the comparison, SmugMug would be like Wikia. The point is that SmugMug capitalizes better on their users with accounts that range between $40-$150 a year in cost. Flickr also misses out on the photobucket revenue play, and the stock photo play that iStockPhoto, GettyImages and other stock photo sites play off of. A perfect Flickr would compete at scale with all of these markets. With 6+ million photos uploaded every day, Flickr could surely monetize better.<p>2. Own the Living Room<p>There are a number of ways that yahoo could signal they are a growth company, and one such way would be to buy a nearly recession proof company like Netflix that makes a habit of friendly interfaces, great customer services, and improving video selection and access. Sure Hulu launched and a number of other internet video sites, but Netflix has paying customers, is involved in revenue positive independent films and could draw the attention of what Mark Cuban is doing with content. Buying Netflix gives Yahoo access to software running on XBOX 360, the PS3 and their own box.<p>3. Partner with IBM<p>60-70% of IBMs revenue is based on services and in a recession services take a hit. IBM is a cash strong company with a ton of expertise in making stuff work. IBM also lacks in content distribution channels. IBM loves the idea of SecondLife, virtual world, virtual goods, and how that relates to the enterprise. Yahoo and IBM could make a great team and buffer Yahoo from being bought by Google or Microsoft; it would create a trinary web market. IBMs hardware expertise would also play well with the Netflix set top box. Yahoo and IBM also have similar brand reputations, with Yahoo being more consumer, and IBM being more enterprise.<p>4. buy Opera, partner with Nintendo<p>Microsoft has IE, Google has FF, and Chrome, Yahoo should buy Opera just to square the field. I believe IBM would support this too. Opera is also the largest mobile web browser, and is on the Nintendo Wii. Next, Yahoo should sign an exclusive distribution play with Nintendo to deliver Social Flash games via the Wii. Yahoo has Y!OS and 1 billion users to promote the Wii’s social and casual gaming status, and Yahoo has the ability to manage a safe relationship with cool Flash games into the living room via the Wii. Buying Opera would allow Yahoo to offer Flash via Javascript full access to the Wiimote’s functionality, and Opera has a history of pushing the browser experience. I think Opera would enjoy the chance at the living room.<p>So that is my 4 point plan to save Yahoo. Pulling all of these off ASAP would be idea, but pulling 1 or two off would still create billions of dollars in revenue a year for Yahoo!, and they are plays that are not in direct competition with Google. They are also good sources of revenue in a recession, games and entertainment typically do well and no one has won the living room like Apple has won music, this is Yahoo!’s chance.

10 comments

markessienover 16 years ago
This is silly. You have a company that is flawed by being a bit unfocused, and your suggestion involves them expanding even more, and spreading themselves even thinner. That would be classic fail.<p>Yahoo is fine and it does not need to do anything about money. Yahoo makes money and that's all that is needed. Yahoo should continue to develop it's strategy of acquiring more users, particularly in the developing world. If yahoo can control a billion users, it does not need to do much.<p>Yahoo is a massive force on the internet, and a score of different cutthroat capitalists are trying to force it to its knees by fearmongering, after which they will take over the company and control those users. Yahoo is right to resist.<p>So long Yahoo is running in profit, it does not need to do anything much apart from cut costs and cut any dead projects. There is nothing to save here, it's still number 1 on the internet.
评论 #347642 未加载
jbyersover 16 years ago
Here's a different four point plan for Yahoo!<p>1. Cut costs to the bone. Ruthlessly reduce headcount, non-core services, and the executive roster. Go until Wall Street thinks you're insane, then cut a bit more for good measure. I'm talking 30% layoffs in one shot, with strong incentives for the remaining top talent to stick around. Forget about playing to the interests of Silicon Valley startups and idealogues. Sell or shutter the acquisitions that don't have a path to material revenue contribution. Fire the consultants. Put a small team of passionate executives in the driver's seat, top up their options, and fire the rest. Make it clear that bureaucracy, infighting, and complacency are over.<p>2. Replace Jerry Yang with a leader who is aggressive, fearless, and given a long leash by the board to steer Yahoo! to a new corporate identity. I actually think Jerry is a good leader, I just believe he's in an impossible situation and needs to be freed from Yahoo! for his and the company's benefit. Ideally promote from within someone who has the passion and vision to lead, maybe paired with an outsider who the axe-man.<p>3. Explore any deal that boosts monetization of Yahoo's massive traffic. Swallow pride, and get solidly in the black. The levers are well within reach, the Yahoo! brand is still a tremendous force on the Internet, and the company sits atop a formidable set of services. Sidle up to your enemies if they'll help you achieve profitability.<p>4. Rediscover Yahoo's soul. While it would be nice to do this ahead of the unpleasant cuts described above, I don't think it's possible. This will be possible when the company is unencumbered by historical baggage, unburdened by a tremendously depressed stock price, and full of people excited to figure out together what the next chapter is for the company. The new soul of Yahoo! will not be found in a consultant's report, executive talking points, a set of loosely-joined web 2.0 startups.<p>Disclaimer: I am a Yahoo! shareholder.
评论 #347652 未加载
mattmaroonover 16 years ago
I don't think Flickr is big enough to make much impact on their bottom line. Even if they doubled revenues, it'd still be a drop in the bucket.<p>Netflix has its own troubles, but might be a good buy for them. Way outside of their core competency, but moving toward it at least. They're probably still wary of trying to become a media company since that's what drove them to where they are now. They bought one V.O.D. company, and the only people who benefited from that were Mark Cuban and Todd Wagner.<p>Not sure what exactly you want them to do with IBM. Any suggestions as to how they could partner? I don't see much synergy there.<p>Why would Nintendo let someone else deliver flash games on their platform? Nintendo most certainly doesn't need anyone's help there. If they decide to go that route, they'll run it themselves. I expect them to do some Xbox Live Arcade type stuff at some point.<p>Yahoo's current strategy of opening up might actually be good and is much more in line with their core competencies. Branching off into goofy tangential media stuff (as a result of hiring a Hollywood CEO) is what got them into this pickle.
评论 #347676 未加载
pedalpeteover 16 years ago
Though I like your Opera angle, particularly with Opera's strength in mobile. Not that i disagree with the rest of your ideas, but they just don't seem to really shout 'strategy', and I gotta say I don't really understand your 'Partner with IBM' plan.<p>I suspect Flickr's strength is specifically that it isn't monetized like SmugMug. They don't need to copy another service, they need to innovate and continue the growth of that platform. Though that may mean stronger monetization of the business, I hope it would not mean simply copying another service.<p>With respect to 'Owning the Living Room', I suspect that this is so far from there strengths as to be unrealistic with the economics currently the way they are. Sure you could argue the same about Google, but they've got the cash to go out and make a mobile OS and give it a go. Yahoo! arguably can't take that risk on a market which is not as large as mobile.<p>Just my thoughts, but I think the Opera angle is a pretty good one.
评论 #347187 未加载
评论 #347205 未加载
trapperover 16 years ago
I respectfully disagree. For what it's worth:<p>The entire yahoo should focus on building a better advertising system than google. I believe they have the tools to do it. Google pushes ads to you by crawling your site and determining what ads should be displayed. What I want, and I believe others would too, is a method of pulling ads to your site completely programmatically. To do this, we would need to be able to classify links, and this is where the power of tagging comes in. My four steps:<p>1. Programmatic "pull" advertising retrieval with complete control. 2. Dynamic ads for single-page applications. 3. Integrate delicious into yahoo itself (e.g. have "tag this" buttons for each search result, and show tag clouds/related tags in search). Make these tags easily obtainable in real time for any website that wants it, which would be required for the "pull" model to work. 4. Integrate flickr into yahoo for the same reasons.<p>Advertisers will switch, because even as lower rates are on yahoo currently, you will have greater contextual ads and greater results with site visitors. You know your site better than google!<p>Advertisers want to be working on a mixed model. Google provides a push advertising model. Yahoo could provide a mixed model, providing push + pull at the sites discretion. I believe if they do this they could take back the lead. And, they have a unique advantage at the moment: delicious and flickr.
ojbyrneover 16 years ago
As a big flickr fan, I'd hate to see it "monetized." At least, not beyond raising the price of a Pro membership. I'd have no problem paying something in the range of $40-80 (though I think the lower part of that range would probably make more sense in terms of the market).
评论 #347690 未加载
swombatover 16 years ago
A better option, which seems to be what Yahoo is already doing with their open apis and such, would be to aim to become a de-facto platform for people to build new start-ups - to expand the market of "creating an online business" and be right in the middle of that market.
Tichyover 16 years ago
Why does Google have FF, just because Google search is the default on the search box? I always change mine to Yahoo.
评论 #347683 未加载
pclarkover 16 years ago
you seem to think all these companies will welcome Yahoo with welcome arms. You're dreaming.
rmsover 16 years ago
Does anyone think that Yahoo's stock is undervalued?
评论 #347222 未加载