One thing that might be skewing the results- this chart is based on regularly-taxed income, which would exclude gains made from things like stock options and grants. I would hypothesize that a good chunk of CS and Engineering majors have done very well for themselves, but not from earning salary alone.<p>However, age is probably the single biggest factor here. Older people tend to be much wealthier and earn far more, and some "tech" degrees like CS weren't even offered (or offered widely) until relatively recently. I would also posit that the rise of very wealthy engineers is a relatively recent phenomenon, compounding the age issue.
I am blown away to see that Art History cracked the top ten on this list. My mom was an art history major, while I insisted on studying computer science, even though apparently there's no money in it. What a rebel I am!<p>Then again, in part knowing the people my mom went to college with, I can't help but suspect that art history is what you major in if you're a bit aimless, yet are expected by your very rich parents to graduate from college.
It's kind of surprising how flat the curve is. Even the "worst" major choices still have plenty of people that make it to the 1%.<p>Of course, nowhere from this data can we conclude that your choice of major has an effect on your future financial success. Just that there's a correlation.
I think we need to be a little careful with this. The article talks about reaching the top 1% as a goal, but if that's a goal held by much more than 1% of the population, a lot of people are going to feel like failures. I don't know that we need to encourage any more of this kind of competition.<p>Far better, I think, would be to talk about the changing economy and what kind of education is most likely to give people a fulfilling career with a reasonably comfortable lifestyle.
I wonder how many of those 1% actually work in the field that they majored in? For example, how many of the zoology "1 percenters" are actually working in the zoology field?
Econ, IR, Poly Sci; all considered, at least my school, to be the fall-back majors when you didn't have the chops for things like biochemistry or physics. I stuck with Engineering because I wanted to do it and also, because it was hard; thus supposedly more rewarding in the long term. But this is almost telling me that the easy way out was the right thing to do ... confused.