The "release" is heavily redacted and is likely a tarpit for conspiracy theorists. There are tons of redactions, missing pages from depositions, "intentionally left blank." There's stuff in there that definitely no one cares about, like one of the victim's school transcripts, or petty assault charges against Ghislaine Maxwell's roommate, but anything substantial is removed from the record, especially pertaining to world leaders (eg. Bill Clinton, Donald Trump) who spent plenty of time on Epstein's jet or hanging out with him at Mar-a-Lago.<p>I spent a good amount of time reading through this release earlier this week and there is practically nothing that wasn't already publicly known years ago.<p>I think the American people deserve answers on why the FBI covered for Epstein and secretly came up with a non-prosecution agreement for his sex crimes in Florida (which were the tip of the iceberg). Or how two prison guards fell asleep at the same time allowing Epstein to supposedly commit suicide. What evidence do we have that Jeffrey Epstein is _actually dead?_ Oh I guess it doesn't matter because now we have swiss cheese court records for one of his flunkies who did get prosecuted. Justice in this country is a myth.
Can we get a 2019 on the title? Or was there a typo somewhere - The docs were not 'just released'.<p>Source: <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/epstein-giuffre-v-maxwell-unsealed-thousands-documents-defamation-2019-8" rel="nofollow">https://www.businessinsider.com/epstein-giuffre-v-maxwell-un...</a>
the Epstein docs were just released: <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs?s=08" rel="nofollow">https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6250471-Epstein-Docs...</a><p>so i want ahead and indexed it all for searchability:
<a href="https://github.com/esteininger/epstein-docs">https://github.com/esteininger/epstein-docs</a><p>Example query:<p><a href="https://collie.ai/show/epstein?defaultSearch=clinton" rel="nofollow">https://collie.ai/show/epstein?defaultSearch=clinton</a>
According to these documents, Les Wexner only comes up twice, in the context of two surface-level questions that aren't pursued. Interesting. What a legendary cover-up of the human-trafficking industry this case has been.
It seems there are portions of the content which is just a bunch of symbols, at least that's what the results are showing (ie. "±ÆÆßÚ ÔÏ œ ‹± ß±´ Wø™ª ø7ß ÆªøT±7 ¨± 檥1ª™ª ¨Wø¨ ø7ß ÔÎ ±J ß±´Æ \Æ1±Æ ")<p>If I click the associated PDF document, I can see there is legible text, so I think it might be an issue with the ingestion of the document itself.
The "elites are child-trafficking pedophiles" thing was considered to be anti-satanistic hysteria and a conspiracy theory in the 1980s.<p>It all turned out to be true.
On mobile (Safari / iOS) it's impossible to enter a query containing a space character, because the <input> field opens the keyboard for typing a URL (with a ".com" key in place of the space bar). I am however able to paste a query including a space into the input field.
ChatGPT quickly and mightily reshaped my brain. In the past, I would have thought to type keywords into the search box, which is what's expected in this case. Instead, my immediate reaction was to ask natural language questions, which this is app is of course not geared for.