There has been a lot of discussion lately, spurred mainly by the SOPA/PIPA issue, on whether copyright protection should exist at all.<p>The argument goes like this: due to technology, copying content has zero cost and we are in a post-scarcity society. People used to the old way of making money impose artificial scarcity (via DRM, laws, etc) in order to keep making money, instead of adapting to the times and finding new ways of making money that are more in line with today's reality.<p>My question for HN is: How do you propose artists/creators make money in a post-copyright world?<p>* For musicians, the answer is rather simple: concerts and live performances<p>* For movie makers, the answer may lie in making the theater experience so compelling that people will pay to see it at the theater instead of seeing it at home on their TV/computer. (I think 3D and IMAX screens are an attempt in that direction)<p>* For book authors, I have no idea how they would make money if copying their books was 100% legal. Any ideas?<p>* What about other content creators?
I'm going to focus on fiction writers, because that's what I do ...<p>One option is to press for alternative compulsory licensing schemes such as PLR to provide grants for productive writers. Drawback: this lets politicians cap authors' incomes and erects barriers to entry. Also, the example of the performing rights societies (like BMI and ASCAP) is a terrible one.<p>Another is for writers to charge for speaking gigs on the side -- as public intellectuals. Some already do this. Most can't; writing tends to be the domain of introverts.<p>A more promising route is the revival of the serial novel. Back in the late 18th/early 19th century, pirate printers would release their own copies of popular work as soon as it came out. So the goal of the author was to stay ahead of the curve. Charles Dickens is the best-known name these days, but was an exemplar of a publishing model where he shipped a chapter a month to his own printer, who would print the signatures (bound pages) and distribute them via itinerant booksellers. (Collectors would collect the signatures and take them to a book-binder when the serial was complete.) This model can in principle work today -- you subscribe, and each day/week/whatever a chunk is delivered to your email account/phone/Kindle/whatever. The books will eventually leak, but while it's being produced the author has a very short-term monopoly on the latest instalment. (Also: they can in principle cut off anyone who they identify as a leaker, by use of fingerprinting (rather than DRM). Thus giving subscribers a moderate incentive not to leak.)<p>Also: Kickstarter. Also: Schneier's "street performer protocol" (essentially a pledge, possibly with funds held in escrow so you pay up-front, the author writes the book when enough folks have signed up, and you get your copy as soon as it's released).
Book authors: I don't know if this worked for anyone, but Stephen King was, years ago (I think before it's time which would be <i>now</i>), requesting money from his fans for every new chapter he wrote. First pay up enough and when it reaches a threshold, the new chapter is written. Anyone know who is trying that now and if it works? It would seem it should work; if I read ch1 and I like what I see, I would pay... Full refund if the threshold is not reached obviously. So Kickstarter per chapter.
I am perfectly happy to pay artists and creators directly for their efforts.<p>But I am a traditional consumer - I buy music from iTunes happily, watch movies on-demand even though I hate the cable company, and occasionally buy art directly from the artist.