What middle class? None of the younger people from the article are middle class. Struggling to pay rent is not a middle class activity. And Techer/Nurse are not good jobs given the low pay (not just compared to other "profressional" jobs but compared to manual jobs once you take into account the cost of student loans and time lost to study).<p>The problem here is people who are working class (a class lower than their parents) but somehow think they are middle class. You've been demoted but no one told you. Sorry.
Isn't part of the problem here that bureaucrats measure and define their own metrics. They have every incentive to report that their policies are effective.<p>There are also malign incentives around Cantillon effects and central planning generally.<p>An incumbent will celebrate economic performance under his reign. He can freely cherry pick flattering statistics and his supporters will repeat the same. The state of the economy is immaterial.<p>Opposition politicians will claim that the incumbent's central planning policies are to blame. When in office the roles reverse. Even if the opposition gives lip service to laissez-faire policies, <i>special</i> <i>circumstances</i> requiring central planning always seem to emerge. Opponents of laissez-faire cite this behavior as proof of debunking.<p>Regardless of who is in charge, the Fed chair will pick a number and price fix the rate of interest. Partisans squabble. Court economists rationalize. Somewhere beyond this charade economic production happens.
Of course the middle class is mad. It's dying. And, as the article correctly points out, how the middle class is doing is a very good indicator for the health of the economy.<p>A big part of this is that we seem to have (in the US) geared our system to prioritize the interests of the wealthy at the expense of everyone else.