TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Brazilian researchers find plastic rocks on remote island

115 pointsby isomorphabout 2 years ago

17 comments

surgical_fireabout 2 years ago
There&#x27;s some beauty on it. Nature incorporates our garbage, and it becomes part of nature.<p>It might kill us, but then new creatures will evolve and grow, with plastic being part of their ecosystem, perhaps even desirable. In million years the future civilization of these creatures might have &quot;plastic preservation programs&quot; because the old plastic rocks are a finite resource upon witch their culture was built.<p>They might even gaze upon their plastic-filled oceans in awe, with some quasi-religious gratitude for the ancient race that gracefully filled the world with plastic that they might thrive.
评论 #35181289 未加载
评论 #35181156 未加载
评论 #35185154 未加载
评论 #35181891 未加载
评论 #35181270 未加载
评论 #35182420 未加载
CTmysteryabout 2 years ago
I guess I shouldn&#x27;t be surprised by the &quot;this is fine&quot; comments here, but I am. Geological changes happen in geological time (outside of massive disruptive events). This change happened in 100 years. Also, comparing this to clay pots is simply not understanding the scale of modern production and waste. It&#x27;s like saying a forest fire doesn&#x27;t pose any problem to my house because I lit a match one time.
评论 #35181576 未加载
评论 #35192791 未加载
Qemabout 2 years ago
I think this counts against the Silurian Hypothesis. If a previous technical civilization existed on earth millions of years ago, by now we would have already found its plastic rocks. Those appears ours.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Silurian_hypothesis" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Silurian_hypothesis</a>
评论 #35181094 未加载
评论 #35185808 未加载
评论 #35182319 未加载
elevaetabout 2 years ago
This is one of the better outcomes for plastics floating around in the oceans that I can think of. Melted and lumped into rocks it won&#x27;t tangle living organisms, and it should be more inert than if it were ground into micro-particles due to far less surface area.<p>It&#x27;s even more beautiful than tangled nets and other plastic debris.<p>I&#x27;m not trying to defend it mind you, we really really need to do a better job of keeping plastic out of the oceans.
评论 #35181237 未加载
评论 #35181423 未加载
评论 #35181993 未加载
nylon_pandaabout 2 years ago
the effect of having plastic merged with rocks is unknown, its bewildering to see comments romanticizing it, akin to those staring in awe of the green sky during chernobyl
评论 #35192846 未加载
评论 #35181552 未加载
is_trueabout 2 years ago
I sometimes help an organizations that monitors the health of a river, a couple of years ago they started buying plastic buoys because the ones made from metal were a bit more expensive.
评论 #35180933 未加载
squeegee_screamabout 2 years ago
We are so fucked
评论 #35180899 未加载
rvieiraabout 2 years ago
Not saying this is good news, but given the current amount of plastic floating around in the oceans, isn&#x27;t aggregating as a big chunk better for the environment[1] than disintegrating into micro-plastics or small debris?<p>[1] excluding the &quot;no plastics in the ocean&quot; choice, of course
评论 #35181548 未加载
jibeabout 2 years ago
Does this article deserve some skepticism? Will fishing nets really melt like that? It looks like they took some oven waste and put it in the oven. If plastics were melting like this in nature, wouldn’t we have seen a lot of it, all over the warm parts of the planet, by now?
评论 #35181502 未加载
评论 #35181240 未加载
评论 #35181230 未加载
code51about 2 years ago
Aside from fire hazard probability, are there any studies done about whether plastics fused with rocks (cement) could be a good material for building houses that are resistant to earthquakes? (Not discarding the use of steel)
评论 #35182379 未加载
评论 #35181592 未加载
c1p0about 2 years ago
Wow, I guess George Carlin was right about this one too.
评论 #35181319 未加载
tambourine_manabout 2 years ago
We don&#x27;t call it the Anthropocene for nothing.
评论 #35182216 未加载
paulcoleabout 2 years ago
This shouldn’t be surprising. We as a society really like plastic stuff and <i>really</i> like pretending our actions as individuals don’t have consequences.<p>It’s like the hotdog meme guy.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;knowyourmeme.com&#x2F;memes&#x2F;were-all-trying-to-find-the-guy-who-did-this" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;knowyourmeme.com&#x2F;memes&#x2F;were-all-trying-to-find-the-g...</a>
评论 #35180886 未加载
xkcd1963about 2 years ago
If this plastic didn&#x27;t decompose due to salty water and sunrays into smaller parts, isn&#x27;t that actually convenient for us, since it is unlikely to get out of the rocks and cause harm?
bell-cotabout 2 years ago
Zzz...<p>If a modern chemical plant is sloppy with $Stable_Chemical, then it&#x27;s no surprise to find that chemical in the ground under it, in the groundwater, etc.<p>The bottom of the Mediterranean is littered with thousands-of-years-old pottery fragments from ancient shipwrecks and such.<p>Coal mining is a thing, all over the world, because microorganisms mostly couldn&#x27;t break down dead trees back during the Carboniferous Era - ~300 million years ago.<p>The sedimentary process how the Earth deals with ~anything that water doesn&#x27;t dissolve, and microorganisms &amp; such can&#x27;t break down. That has not been news since 4 or so billion years ago.
评论 #35181026 未加载
评论 #35181006 未加载
评论 #35180931 未加载
评论 #35181300 未加载
RickHullabout 2 years ago
Terrifying, really? Terraforming, maybe, but it seems a little hysterical to react with terror to this phenomenon.
domatic1about 2 years ago
It’s just melted plastic from fishing nets and other debris
评论 #35180611 未加载
评论 #35180808 未加载
评论 #35180686 未加载