Did it actually make any money? Would have been more interesting without the investor bit.<p>Kinda just proved that random people will give you money to be a part of something popular.
Who's gonna be the first to wire up ChatGPT's API to a live system? A human copying and pasting is one thing but the playground interface gives a bit more room to work with but the real adventure begins when it can actually affect some sort of change to the outside world via an API it's been glued into.
See previous discussion of this here: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35175529" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35175529</a>
Pretty good example of what chatgpt can't actually do. It should be unable to distinguish between BS self help money types and actual profitable ideas.
Has the restriction been lifted? I asked chatGPT what it would charge for its services and it refused to answer and then argued with me about ethics and being programmed to help and all the usual bullshit. Is this via jailbreak? Do we really need to jailbreak to answer the interesting questions? Wow openAI really knows how to stand between themselves and happy customers.
Let's see where this goes. I've been using ChatGP for a few weeks now, mostly for programming related questions. It does make pretty drastic mistakes and can be rather obtuse when asked about subtelties. Maybe GPT-4 will do better, but for real life there is not as much online training material as for Python modules.
As interesting as the developments in LLMs are, I think it's just as interesting to see how people are creating new interfaces for the AI to interact with the real world.