Does anyone have link to the source paper that keeps being mentioned in the article?<p>Asking because there was one thing they didn't address in the article that feels kind of too relevant to omit - the total number of tweets/week before and after Musk taking over. The article only mentions raw counts of antisemitic tweets before and after. That's pretty important.<p>For example, if the overall number of tweets/week increased by 3x, and the number of antisemitic tweets/week increased by 2.5x, that would actually be a reduction in the percentage of antisemitic tweets (even though their raw count more than doubled). That information can only be known if there is a raw count of all tweets available for the same points in time.<p>Disclaimer: I am not disagreeing with the conclusion of the article, I just want to see how they arrived at their conclusion and what methodology they used to measure that increase.
> The analysis found an average of over 6,200 posts per week appearing to contain antisemitic language between June 1 and Oct. 27<p>> [T]hat figure rose to over 12,700 through early February — a 105 percent increase.<p>> a three-fold increase in the rate of “hateful account creation.”<p>> "a sustained volume of antisemitic hate speech on the platform following the takeover”<p>> “Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews”<p>> Twitter replied to a request for comment with an email containing a poop emoji.