TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The Cambrian Period of AI

113 pointsby lachlan_grayabout 2 years ago

10 comments

optimalsolverabout 2 years ago
It&#x27;s all deep learning, making it the exact opposite of a Cambrian event.<p>Has anyone has tried searching for new basic operations, below the level of neural networks? We&#x27;ve been using these methods for years, and I doubt the first major breakthrough in ML is the most optimal method possible.<p>Consider the extreme case of searching over all mathematical and logical operations to see if something really novel can be discovered.<p>How feasible would this be?<p>&gt;Tying it together, a big diversification is likely coming<p>I&#x27;d be interested in knowing what signs, if any, currently point to that.<p>What I see is a coalescing around the current paradigm. And considering that the hardware side led by NVIDIA is catering to this paradigm, I don&#x27;t see us breaking out of this local optimum any time soon.
评论 #35377447 未加载
评论 #35378737 未加载
评论 #35377582 未加载
评论 #35381699 未加载
lachlan_grayabout 2 years ago
Hey hn, this is my first blog post. The community here inspired me to finally try it out.<p>I would really appreciate any feedback on clarity, or anything that causes good or bad gut reactions.
评论 #35377828 未加载
评论 #35376656 未加载
评论 #35379252 未加载
评论 #35377282 未加载
评论 #35383661 未加载
评论 #35377264 未加载
评论 #35376484 未加载
manojldsabout 2 years ago
Or is this the String Theory period of AI.
评论 #35378003 未加载
评论 #35378687 未加载
BartjeDabout 2 years ago
I understand it seems clever to frame AI trends in an evolutionary setting.<p>But no one was there in the Cambrian period. We have no idea what the circumstances really were. I&#x27;m not dismissing historical sources. Just saying the timescale and comparative lack of sources equate to a lot of unreliability.<p>The real question is how much AI is a step up in tooling. The fact that humans develop tools using their intelligence is well documented. And doesn&#x27;t require a detour into evolutionary theory.<p>The society with the best tools for the problems it faces has a competitive advantage.
评论 #35378971 未加载
FrustratedMonkyabout 2 years ago
I think big jump in ai &#x27;evolution&#x27; will be the competition part. Like DeepMind with alphastar. They got results by having different models compete, in multiple rounds to more &#x27;evolve&#x27; towards a winning strategy. So far it seems like the news is with these single big models, but evolution kicks in if they start doing what is needed to survive.
xwdvabout 2 years ago
IMO the only problem we should be focusing AI on right now is having it figure out how to make more advanced and powerful AI. Alas, this is beyond AI’s potential right now. Humans are still very much needed.
评论 #35378400 未加载
评论 #35384558 未加载
评论 #35377960 未加载
FrustratedMonkyabout 2 years ago
LOL. Love it. It&#x27;s really metaphors all the way down.
devindotcomabout 2 years ago
Heh, I started an article with the same metaphor was too busy to finish it. We&#x27;ll see what the fossil record looks like in a few years though.
th16rowabout 2 years ago
Or not, and perhaps this is all there is to it and every new model is less revolutionary than the last one. Diminishing returns and all that.
earthboundkidabout 2 years ago
It&#x27;s 1980 and every LLM is a Wang.