AI needn't even try to escape, the clueless humans will plug it into reallity by themselves.<p>Given this totally expected attitude I hope that the base models will never be released to the general population.
I had ChatGPT write an entire web app for me last week. I was surprised at how capable it was.<p>Here's a writeup of my workflow: <a href="https://github.com/paul-gauthier/easy-chat">https://github.com/paul-gauthier/easy-chat</a><p>Basically all of the code in that repo was written by ChatGPT.
I don't get it. The gif shows the bot generating a recipe. Where is it that it's "autonomously develops and manages businesses to increase net worth"? Which businesses? What net worth?<p>Can someone explain?
This seems... dangerously careless. What if it uses the internet to seek out zero day vulnerabilities and exploit them routinely? Sure humans also do this, but we're talking about a new level of 0day exploit carried out at scale. Sure, maybe it won't, but do you trust a hallucinating, left-brained, internet-trained intelligence to be strictly logical and mindful for all it's actions that is taking self autonomously (as this project aims to do)?
Give it access to its own controls <a href="https://git.fedi.ai/derek/talkradio-ai/issues/11" rel="nofollow">https://git.fedi.ai/derek/talkradio-ai/issues/11</a>
That's pretty awesome. I wanted to try an experiment like that with ChatGPT moderating an IRC channel. I started here <a href="https://github.com/realrasengan/chatgpt-groupchat-test">https://github.com/realrasengan/chatgpt-groupchat-test</a> determining whether it was being spoken to and whether it should respond or not, and then providing that in json form so that it could be asked then to create the response in a sort of mini-chain of responses. It could also simply be asked, 'do you think this person should be kicked for their actions?' (Just for experiment and science purposes of course lol).
Big fan of Auto GPT but def not ready out of the box just yet. If anyone needs help with getting started I created a step by step guide: <a href="https://youtu.be/ka5VI7ay3uE" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/ka5VI7ay3uE</a>
The demo already shows the problem. It picks an event, the AI picks Earth Day. Then it makes a recipe with an avocado in it.<p>And writes it is good for the planet. Avocados are exactly the opposite. They have an extremely high water consumption and then have to be imported from all over the world.<p>Contrary to the author who claims, "Auto-GPT pushes the boundaries of what is possible with AI." I don't find that.<p>Why can't you just use GPT-4 as it is. It is an insanely tool to simplify many things. But it's still a long way from being ready, and it's not meant to decide anything on its own. And even to reflect reasonably out of own motivation.
We are about to get nuked. Only this time nuke is AI that remove any meaning from our so-called high life. I'm thinking moving to Hydarabad to fry samosas. Fortunately won't be automated.
I find it mildly amusing that AI "breakthrough" follows with lots of references towards hallucinations. Apparently it's not only the AI hallucinating, also the the doom seeker.
Hammer is not dangerous intrinsically. You can build shelter for people in need with it, or kill a human being.<p>Just like this tool; you can make a auto research bot, or automated spammer.<p>Even in that worst case: Remember that there were already bad human beings. This is why we created laws, intelligence agencies, militaries and police systems. And security practices for websites, such as bot protection systems.
I wonder are they using these autonomous GPT loops to control DAOs? <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralized_autonomous_organization" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralized_autonomous_organ...</a>
Some missing features: give access to terminal, bypass captchas, allow online payments, use a bank account, let it use a phone using TTS, let it generate photos and post on internet...