I'm really uncomfortable with this guy's reasoning. One of the motivations for him to go back to work is to feel less rejected by his children. In this post and a linked post he says he thinks he's spent too much time at home with them and is deeply hurt that they prefer their mother over him. So he wants to go back to work to "protect his heart".<p>I think that's a waaaaay bigger issue for him to address than the financial ones. Maybe there's truth to that experience but going back to avoid your children makes it seem like something is seriously out of whack here.
If it's going to cost $1,500,000 for two kids to go to college in 12 years, the result will be that almost no one goes to college. At that point, <i>any</i> post-secondary education is going to look good to employers.
Feels like a trivial message ("yeah you need a regular job to raise a family unless you have FU money") packaged as a grand experiment. On the flip side, single folks or those without kids have been retiring for a long time (without calling it FIRE)
> However, the Fed needs to pivot by the end of the year to prevent a 10%+ nationwide decline in real estate prices.<p>No they don’t! Think of how many couples are holding off on kids because of the housing prices.