TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

It's 2012, and there's still no official SIP to Skype gateway

10 pointsby xxqsover 13 years ago
Any idea why Skype does not provide any official means to call skype accounts from a SIP connection? Even a paid interface is not available. The only thing that is available is a paid service where you can call phone numbers from Skype to your SIP trunk<p>so, there's a huge world of SIP telephony, and another huge world of Skype users. And they don't talk to each other.<p>I'm not considering dirty hacks which bind Asterisk or FreeSWITCH with a Skype GUI client installed on the same machine.

9 comments

wmfover 13 years ago
The purpose of Skype is to have a monopoly on the namespace and interop threatens that. Realistically, don't most people use SIP with phones that can only dial numbers?
评论 #3553087 未加载
blakdawgover 13 years ago
Who would make money if this existed? Who would lose money? I have a hard time articulating a concrete benefit for Microsoft that would result from a gateway.
评论 #3553096 未加载
tnucover 13 years ago
&#62;so, there's a huge world of SIP telephony, and another huge world of Skype users. And they don't talk to each other.<p>They do talk to each other, users pay for the privilege.<p>Think of it as a win/win for skype/sip providers. Just not a win for the users.
评论 #3553091 未加载
mcsover 13 years ago
There's an online service called Blue Jeans Network that lets you have a conference call with Skype, H.323, Google Talk, and Microsoft Lync participants.<p><a href="http://bluejeans.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bluejeans.com/</a>
评论 #3553103 未加载
iso8859-1over 13 years ago
Here's a link for the hack you mentioned: <a href="http://www.personal.psu.edu/wcs131/blogs/psuvoip/2011/12/skype_for_asterisk_the_hard_way.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.personal.psu.edu/wcs131/blogs/psuvoip/2011/12/sky...</a>
评论 #3553094 未加载
learntogoogleover 13 years ago
"Still no"?<p>There was "Skype for Asterisk" for a long time, and unsurprisingly it's the first hit on Google. It was killed shortly after MS bought Skype. Life is hard when you buy into proprietary protocols.
评论 #3553078 未加载
vollmarjover 13 years ago
So... Skype launched their official SIP service years ago. It is called Skype Connect. They wouldn't provide a gateway because that would cannibalize their low cost SIP trunking service. See <a href="http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/business/skype-connect/" rel="nofollow">http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/business/skype-connect/</a>
评论 #3553083 未加载
wslhover 13 years ago
It is complex to fully reverse engineer Skype: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype_protocol" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype_protocol</a>
评论 #3553100 未加载
patroclesover 13 years ago
and no IPv6.<p>granted, getting rid of NAT probably means Skype dies
评论 #3553109 未加载