The idea is hardly unique, what matters more is that you have to somehow agree to the choice of content presented by the author of the summary in question.<p>I'm doing one of these myself for a few months, over at <a href="http://f5n.org/stack/" rel="nofollow">http://f5n.org/stack/</a> (and it consists at least 50% of HN content, so I didn't post it here as of yet.)<p>As I've also written somewhere my inspirations were <a href="http://www.foldl.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foldl.org/</a> and <a href="http://chneukirchen.org/trivium" rel="nofollow">http://chneukirchen.org/trivium</a> - because there's stuff I like to see, I couldn't care less for weekly JS and Ruby links, for example, however rich in quality they would be :)