TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Derek Parfit: The Perfectionist at All Souls

26 pointsby miobrienabout 2 years ago

7 comments

thedailymailabout 2 years ago
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;RzLH7" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;RzLH7</a>
zvmazabout 2 years ago
I don&#x27;t know a lot about Derek Parfit, but one interesting philosopher who claims to have solved Parfits&#x27; problems about population and moral theory is David Benatar [1]. His solution is anti-natalism, which he defends extensively in his book Better Never to Have Been, The Harm of Coming into Existence.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;academic.oup.com&#x2F;book&#x2F;32901&#x2F;chapter-abstract&#x2F;276643008" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;academic.oup.com&#x2F;book&#x2F;32901&#x2F;chapter-abstract&#x2F;2766430...</a>
评论 #35694588 未加载
评论 #35694655 未加载
rektideabout 2 years ago
The moral obligation to future people is a strong current that runs through Kim Stanley Robinson&#x27;s <i>Ministry for the Future,</i> a recent semi hope-punk book of his.<p>Fun to run across an earlier line of inquiry here, in Parfit.<p>And a code I strongly believe in. Orienting yourself to best help the future, perhaps even futures beyond your time. As the Greek proverb goes:<p>&gt; <i>A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit.</i>
评论 #35694375 未加载
2b3a51about 2 years ago
<i>&quot;Few works of philosophy have the urgency of Reasons and Persons, which was written with extraordinary speed, driving its author to the brink of collapse and its publisher to despair.&quot;</i><p>Makes me feel slightly less bad about abandoning my first attempt at reading this very dense book. I was trying to read it in short bits (the book is split into quite short sections but with a big apparatus of parts, chapters, sections and so on with implied cross referencing) during a busy time.<p>I&#x27;ll try again over the summer in a more concentrated way.<p>No recourse to spirits or pills though...
dangabout 2 years ago
Related:<p><i>How to Be Good: The Philosopher Derek Parfit (2011)</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22037240" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22037240</a> - Jan 2020 (6 comments)<p><i>Why anything? Why this? (1998)</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13315746" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13315746</a> - Jan 2017 (77 comments)<p><i>Derek Parfit has died</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13304873" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13304873</a> - Jan 2017 (38 comments)<p><i>How to Be Good: Derek Parfit&#x27;s Moral Philosophy</i> - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11273495" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=11273495</a> - March 2016 (16 comments)
archon1410about 2 years ago
I remember reading an account of how Parfit cared deeply about the suffering of the world that he would cry talking about ethics.
greenie_beansabout 2 years ago
trying to remember the fiction book where derek parfit was mentioned. was it a michael bible book? blake butler?