TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

SimpLESS compiless .less into beautiful .css

92 pointsby diwankover 13 years ago

16 comments

skrebbelover 13 years ago
Genuinely wondering: it looks like there went a considerable amount of effort into the design, presentation and polishing of what's effectively a small programmer utility. Do the authors expect to somehow generate an income from this? If so, how?<p>Btw ups for decent cross-platform-ness. Most of the tools in this space are either *nix-only or Windows-only.
评论 #3571109 未加载
评论 #3571484 未加载
评论 #3571567 未加载
EnderMBover 13 years ago
I'm using SimpLESS at work at the moment, on both Macs and PC's. I did intend to choose CodeKit (same guys as Less.app), but then read their, frankly immature FAQ.<p>SimpLESS is the perfect name, as the program works brilliantly in the background. I'd highly recommend it for both Mac and PC users.
评论 #3571578 未加载
评论 #3572035 未加载
评论 #3572586 未加载
diwankover 13 years ago
SimpLESS and less.app have been around for quite some time now. Yet, it is really painful to see so many developers copying-and-pasting compiled css from the chrome dev console. Further, client-side less.js uses ajax, forcing you to setup a web server on some development environments.<p>SimpLESS is highly recommended, as it lets you focus on the code rather than figuring out the compilation bit. Auto-minification is a big plus too.<p>P.S. It's nice to see a good and usable Titanium application. :)
nixarnover 13 years ago
I think this is really nice. I usually find it too much of a hassel to setup the dev environment with less support. The website is really cool as well - nice work!
评论 #3571177 未加载
dmvaldmanover 13 years ago
The idea of compilation-on-save is a very useful one, but here's my only gripe: it needs to be integrated with my IDE. Maybe the idea is that "if you build it, they will integrate."<p>But until then I have my own solution which is that I have a keyboard shortcut that runs a bash script to compile the .less, focus on/open chrome and reload the page (all in one step!). I use the awesome software (windows and mac) quickkeys to do it.
评论 #3571322 未加载
评论 #3572307 未加载
janusover 13 years ago
Very well polished.<p>I think it might be super useful to get frontend designers who are afraid of the command line to use LESS even more.
skilesareover 13 years ago
Anyone having issues on Windows? I drag my project folder over...I only have one .less file in my /content folder of an asp.net mvc project. simpleLess throws and error saying Syntax Error on line 1.<p>This Less file works great when using run time compilation.
评论 #3572112 未加载
chrisackyover 13 years ago
I'm struggling to get it to run in Linux. The installer doesn't work, and if I run the binary directly, when I drag a folder, it says... (among other things)..<p>TypeError: Result of expression 'e.dataTransfer' [undefined] is not an object.<p>Any suggestions?
评论 #3571333 未加载
评论 #3572292 未加载
评论 #3571555 未加载
c4urselfover 13 years ago
It's not really different from Less.app and just like Less.app you don't need it when developing locally using the client-side approach. If you make compilation part of your deploy you basically don't need these apps at all.
评论 #3571086 未加载
评论 #3571045 未加载
MatthewPhillipsover 13 years ago
Could someone who uses less regularly lay out the advantages over vanilla css? I see nesting and vender-prefix normalizing, but to me those are pretty small gains. I'm sure I'm missing something.
评论 #3571297 未加载
评论 #3571265 未加载
评论 #3571356 未加载
评论 #3571329 未加载
评论 #3571416 未加载
datrover 13 years ago
This is really nice and it looks to be written all in js using Accelerator Titanium. I've never heard of Titanium before anyone have any experience using it? What's it like?
评论 #3572457 未加载
评论 #3571340 未加载
wooptooover 13 years ago
I use this script: <a href="https://bitbucket.org/wooptoo/bin/src/tip/lc" rel="nofollow">https://bitbucket.org/wooptoo/bin/src/tip/lc</a><p>SimpLESS is better though.
rgbrgbover 13 years ago
I'm so confused why I would use that rather than <a href="http://incident57.com/less/" rel="nofollow">http://incident57.com/less/</a><p>Thoughts?
评论 #3572472 未加载
评论 #3572141 未加载
michaelkscottover 13 years ago
+1 for really great, usable design.
tormentorover 13 years ago
Is CSS honestly that difficult? I mean I see why this could help but this just seems to add another layer of complication. I don't know maybe I'm just being a cynic with all these sorry excuses for technology.
评论 #3571423 未加载
评论 #3571413 未加载
abhisecover 13 years ago
They should probably test twitter bootstrap as many folks will use this with bootstrap. Unfortunately bootstrap compile fails.
评论 #3572433 未加载