TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

My pay went from $240k to $0

243 pointsby epilysabout 2 years ago

13 comments

javajoshabout 2 years ago
There are too many situations in our society where money wins because they hire better lawyers. The solution is not to make more money to hire better lawyers, but to change the system so such a step isn&#x27;t necessary. I don&#x27;t know if people have noticed, but lawyers win when people fight, and the more they fight, the more complicated the law and the case, the more wealth is transferred to the legal profession. I&#x27;d like to see short contracts, arbitration, and reasonable support for pro se representation in court. Judges cannot and should not look down on self-representing litigants, and the law and court rules should not be so complex that an average citizen cannot navigate it.<p>Of course, lawyers represent the single most powerful political bloc in the nation, so it&#x27;s a tough road.
评论 #35811199 未加载
评论 #35811242 未加载
评论 #35811484 未加载
评论 #35811171 未加载
评论 #35811534 未加载
评论 #35811175 未加载
评论 #35811330 未加载
评论 #35811213 未加载
评论 #35812503 未加载
评论 #35813325 未加载
评论 #35822833 未加载
评论 #35812332 未加载
评论 #35811142 未加载
评论 #35811137 未加载
评论 #35811789 未加载
评论 #35811183 未加载
ggmabout 2 years ago
The entire residuals model in content is a giant scam. Most people have no option to negotiate real money: its based on accounting firms returns on investment to the (shell) company which makes the content.<p>they hide most of the profit in wierd finance games. So, the residuals? they dont have to be paid: its not &quot;profitable&quot;<p>Alec Guinness is an example of somebody smart enough to make his residuals work in Star Wars. He is said to have been overjoyed at the income, but continued to be underjoyed (tm) in the product.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.hollywoodreporter.com&#x2F;movies&#x2F;movie-news&#x2F;alec-guinness-star-wars-obi-wan-1235152814&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.hollywoodreporter.com&#x2F;movies&#x2F;movie-news&#x2F;alec-gui...</a>
评论 #35811038 未加载
jpsterabout 2 years ago
Off topic but this is the first time I’ve seen a Mastodon post hit #1 on HN. Interesting datapoint re Twitter’s self-imposed mortal wound.
评论 #35811190 未加载
评论 #35811276 未加载
评论 #35811557 未加载
评论 #35814623 未加载
评论 #35811249 未加载
评论 #35816730 未加载
amatechaabout 2 years ago
Does &quot;per broadcast episode&quot; not mean &quot;per episode that was broadcast&quot;? The irregular verb &quot;broadcast&quot; is the same whether present or past tense. Or is there some definition of &quot;broadcast&quot; specified at the top of the contract to make sure it&#x27;s not interpreted as a past-tense verb? Or something? That said, good luck fighting it in court regardless I guess...
评论 #35811793 未加载
评论 #35811489 未加载
评论 #35811665 未加载
ecuafloabout 2 years ago
The Back button on Mastodon takes you back to your previous page in your history stack interestingly.
评论 #35811294 未加载
评论 #35811520 未加载
评论 #35811273 未加载
misssocratesabout 2 years ago
What are the odds there are missing details in this story?
评论 #35812422 未加载
评论 #35811232 未加载
internetterabout 2 years ago
Is this bait and switch actually legal?
评论 #35811051 未加载
评论 #35811016 未加载
评论 #35811062 未加载
评论 #35811034 未加载
评论 #35811022 未加载
评论 #35811039 未加载
评论 #35811044 未加载
Gunnerheadabout 2 years ago
I’m not sure I understand the difference or technicality. Could someone help explain?
评论 #35811286 未加载
评论 #35811297 未加载
评论 #35811265 未加载
hiyerabout 2 years ago
I thought it was some tech dude who got laid off, but this is so much worse.
MagicMoonlightabout 2 years ago
If people are watching it then it is being broadcast so I’d dispute that. Clearly moving it to a different channel would be covered in the contract.
carlivarabout 2 years ago
I wonder if that was the show &quot;Sliders&quot;?
评论 #35811365 未加载
Moneyyyyyabout 2 years ago
Not getting it.<p>Why would his salary change?<p>Or is this again a waitress issue? Instead of paying them proper money they get nothing and royalty?
m3kw9about 2 years ago
Capitalism at work? Seriously, why am I not surprised if they can get away with saving fees they wouldn’t? Big corps are ruthless, the calculations are cold. Unlike if you work for me personally for example I wouldnt want to screw someone that bad if I can help it