>The problematic configuration which was applied manually (i.e. was not based on the default values of kubo-v0.17)<p>So how did 60% of the network become <i>manually</i> mis-configured? Or does a single company (cloudflare?) make up 60% of the network?
Am I the only one who finds it a bit odd that the article starts off bragging about what was an outage?<p>And I as soon as I hear “we were still running with half our network down”, the first thing I think of is that no one really is using IPFS at all.