TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Intel Issues New CPU Microcode for New, Undisclosed Security Updates

42 pointsby cyloabout 2 years ago

4 comments

mjevansabout 2 years ago
It&#x27;s been long enough, can we please just have Intel (YEAR) CPU as a reference rather than the eternally opaque codenames?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Coffee_Lake" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Coffee_Lake</a><p>Intel 2017+ CPUs (Coffee Lake+).
评论 #35924851 未加载
评论 #35935104 未加载
johnklosabout 2 years ago
For the BSDs and Linux, microcode updates can be loaded by the OS. What about Windows? Are microcode updates made available via Windows, or only via BIOS updates if the system manufacturer decides to make updates?<p>If the latter, what do people do when their system manufacturer doesn&#x27;t provide updates?
评论 #35926701 未加载
评论 #35926101 未加载
ruikabout 2 years ago
A nice test would be to compare a &quot;cpuid -1 -r&quot; before and after applied microcode updates. To check if new bit(s) is set somewhere.<p>Worth might be to check if IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES contain new bits set as well on some platforms which would indicate they are not affected. Via the NO_xxx flag.
usr1106about 2 years ago
Phoronix certainly has strong technical background. However, I am not friend of their sometimes dramatic writing style. I call them the Linux yellow press :) Let&#x27;s wait and see whether that SA comes and whether it brings something big.
评论 #35926772 未加载