TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Renewables supplied 65% of new US utility-scale generating capacity in Q1 2023

110 pointsby kieranmaineabout 2 years ago

5 comments

kieranmaineabout 2 years ago
To provide some context on why this is important, the IEAs&#x27;s report &quot;Credible Pathways to 1.5 °C: Four pillars for action in the 2020s&quot; (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.iea.org&#x2F;reports&#x2F;credible-pathways-to-150c" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.iea.org&#x2F;reports&#x2F;credible-pathways-to-150c</a>) states:<p>&quot;Capacity additions of renewables need to triple from 2022 levels by 2030, reaching around 1 200 GW annually, representing on average 90% of new generation capacity each year&quot;
评论 #35966968 未加载
JoeAltmaierabout 2 years ago
To put in perspective: American generating capacity was 1.2 million MW. The additions amount to maybe 4000 MW. So an increase of 0.3%<p>Gonna take a while to change over
评论 #35969150 未加载
评论 #35969142 未加载
m463about 2 years ago
Aside from solar and wind, I wondered about biomass renewables (after watching Michael Moore&#x27;s planet of the humans)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Planet_of_the_Humans" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Planet_of_the_Humans</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Zk11vI-7czE">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Zk11vI-7czE</a><p>glad to see it&#x27;s not the majority of &quot;renewables&quot; and that they are mostly solar, wind and hydro.
edouard-harrisabout 2 years ago
In practice, the real number is probably closer to 36% than to 65% (and likely even lower).<p>Here&#x27;s the problem: the article doesn&#x27;t account for the capacity factors of the various new installed sources they mention [1]. A capacity factor is the <i>actual</i> electrical energy produced by a generating unit, divided by the <i>maximum</i> possible electrical energy that generating unit could have produced if it were operating continuously at full power. And under real-world conditions, most renewable energy sources produce at <i>far</i> below their theoretical capacity maximum.<p>For example: wind turbines have a capacity factor around 36%, and solar installations are under 25% [2]. If we apply these factors to correct the numbers in the article, the picture becomes much bleaker: the headline 1475 MW of new wind capacity drops to just 531 MW, while the headline 2530 MW of installed solar drops to 632 MW. Now let&#x27;s generously assume that the 100 MW of hydro and 29 MW of biomass from the article both operate at a 100% capacity factor. Under those assumptions, total new installed renewable capacity drops from 4134 MW to 1292 MW — more than threefold. [3]<p>And of course, the real-world shortfall is even worse than this. Electricity markets need to clear <i>continuously</i>, and the capacity factor for solar when the sun isn&#x27;t shining is not 25%, but 0%. That means if the hours of peak demand coincide with hours during which solar is offline (which they do during much of the year) there is no amount of solar you <i>can</i> install that will keep the grid online. To sum up: there is no way to escape the need for reliable baseload power. [4]<p>[1] At least, the article doesn&#x27;t mention correcting for capacity factors. And the FERC source document it cites gives me a blank page when I click on it in Firefox, meaning there is no way to be sure whether anyone applied this correction. I&#x27;m assuming they didn&#x27;t, because citing high &quot;headline&quot; capacity numbers like this is unfortunately very common in discussions about renewable energy sources.<p>[2] Capacity factor numbers are for installations in the United States during 2022, from the Energy Information Administration: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eia.gov&#x2F;electricity&#x2F;monthly&#x2F;epm_table_grapher.php?t=table_6_07_b" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eia.gov&#x2F;electricity&#x2F;monthly&#x2F;epm_table_grapher.ph...</a><p>[3] From the article: 2530 MW of solar, 1475 MW of wind, 100 MW of new hydro, 29 MW of new biomass, 2259 MW of natural gas.<p>[4] Even battery installations don&#x27;t get you there. Between 2022 and 2026, the US is expected to add only 24 <i>minutes</i> worth of battery storage to its grid. This includes residential, non-residential, and grid-scale installations. Sources: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pv-magazine-usa.com&#x2F;2022&#x2F;09&#x2F;14&#x2F;u-s-installed-a-record-2-6-gwh-of-grid-scale-energy-storage-in-q2" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pv-magazine-usa.com&#x2F;2022&#x2F;09&#x2F;14&#x2F;u-s-installed-a-recor...</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eia.gov&#x2F;energyexplained&#x2F;electricity&#x2F;electricity-in-the-us-generation-capacity-and-sales.php" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eia.gov&#x2F;energyexplained&#x2F;electricity&#x2F;electricity-...</a>
评论 #35968758 未加载
评论 #35968472 未加载
jeffbeeabout 2 years ago
Why isn&#x27;t it 100%?
评论 #35966025 未加载
评论 #35966806 未加载
评论 #35967972 未加载