TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Using computers more freely and safely

159 pointsby gstipialmost 2 years ago

11 comments

the-printeralmost 2 years ago
So much can be commented on in response to points or perspectives that aren’t included in a person’s position. The amount of remarks on the unspoken tend to increase in relation to the responder’s nitpickiness over the author’s choice of words.<p>One of the strangest things is when people over-interpret modest remarks as declarations of war against the fabric of sensibility and human decency. This seems to be a trend nowadays.<p>I don’t think that the author of this article&#x2F;talk meant to discourage people away from all software contrary to the types he discussed here and it doesn’t sound like that. It reads like a modest appeal.
评论 #36114803 未加载
taopaialmost 2 years ago
I am not technical. I come from a science background so I am somewhat limited in regards to software development.<p>I used to try a lot of APPS to produce documents and scruture my mind. Notion, google docs, word, calc, excel... It was fine but it I agree that some times is a pain. Google docs run very slow in my computer, Windows overheats in my laptop , etc.<p>Finally I discovered Emacs. I am pretty bad with elisp but I love it. Now I just use, Emacs, a couple of web browsers, bash, Python and some perl scripts.<p>While this article oversimplificates some things It has valid points for specific cases. btw, I like this web design!
评论 #36115104 未加载
vctrnkalmost 2 years ago
(bit of a rant here, you&#x27;ve been warned)<p>As someone who <i>could&#x27;ve</i> developed an IT&#x2F;programming career, but didn&#x27;t because I felt things were already bloating back in the &#x27;00s, I agree with the majority: &quot;harvesting your own food&quot; can be rewarding but also a tedious and thankless job. It&#x27;s certainly not for everyone, but if it works for some people then it is (let&#x27;s put efficiency aside for a moment) perfectly valid. In fact, being more of a H&#x2F;W guy I find myself gravitating towards this approach more often than not. Leanness and reproducibility is key for my workflow (I went the RF-world path), I can&#x27;t afford different end results when a dependency changes&#x2F;breaks something.<p>IMHO, keeping up with the modern paradigms for S&#x2F;W development looks like a never-ending nightmare. Yes it&#x27;s the modern way, yeah it&#x27;s the state of the art. Still, I didn&#x27;t feel it was a wise investment of my time to learn all those &quot;modern dev&quot; ropes, and I still feel that 20 years later. I&#x27;m nowhere near antiquated and I&#x27;m on top of all things tech (wouldn&#x27;t read HN otherwise), it&#x27;s just...<p>I see former friends&#x2F;classmates that went this way, and they&#x27;re in a constant cat-and-mouse game where 50% of time they&#x27;re learning&#x2F;setting up something dev-chain related, the rest 50% doing actual work, and 98% of it feeling way too stressed. I see modern Android devices with their multi-MB apps, bloated to hell and beyond for a simple UI that takes ages to open on multi-core, multi-GHZ SOCs. I see people advocating unused RAM is wasted RAM, never satisfied until every byte is put to good use, reluctant to admit that said good use is just leaving the machine there &quot;ready&quot; to do something, but not doing anything _productive_ actually.<p>And yet.<p>Without that bloat, without the convienience of pre-made libraries and assist tools for almost every function one could desire, we wouldn&#x27;t be where we are now. Imagine for a moment doing AI-work, 3D movie rendering, data science etc. with a DBless approach on single-core machines with every resource micro-managed to eke out the most performance. It&#x27;s simply not feasible, we would still be on the 90s... just a bit more hipster.<p>This article resonates so well with me. And at the same time, it feels so distant.
评论 #36115406 未加载
评论 #36118279 未加载
评论 #36115367 未加载
评论 #36122617 未加载
amatechaalmost 2 years ago
I love the sentiments and ideas presented. Thanks for putting these thoughts into words, and sharing. Not sure why some ppl interpret your post as some kind of militant set of demands. It&#x27;s very thought-provoking and helps think about software and its creation&#x2F;curation&#x2F;usage in a different light. The deeply-instilled &quot;corporate vendor -&gt; money-expending user&quot; ecosystem of software and computing comes with many costs, sociological, psychological and so on. Further, the ability to have agency over one&#x27;s computing experience is basically constantly threatened by software vendors and constantly-lobbied regulators. I think it&#x27;s wise to persistently question the status quo, especially when it is largely dominated by profit-centric intentions.
pjc50almost 2 years ago
This is the &quot;just eat less&quot; dieting advice applied to software.<p>I understand the desire to grow your own food and bake your own bread, as a response to the onerous, distressing complexity of the systems we live inside, but you have to accept the cost of that being more work and less connection.
评论 #36113481 未加载
lamontcgalmost 2 years ago
Upon self reflection over several decades, I think I would prefer to have not been thinking like this quite so much.<p>Which isn&#x27;t to say I think I should have been a front end webdev chasing after the next new shiney every 3-6 months so I felt like I had my pulse right on the bleeding edge of new technology.<p>But I use a Jetbrains IDE now quite a bit to write code when I used to be a vi&#x2F;vim user.
troupealmost 2 years ago
&gt; Humanity didn&#x27;t get good at building houses by building the same house a million times.<p>The amount of quality variation that we are willing to accept in our houses is much greater than what we are willing to accept in an automobile. The quality of the automobile is BECAUSE we make millions of the same car over and over again.
评论 #36114960 未加载
评论 #36116321 未加载
saagarjhaalmost 2 years ago
&gt; Prefer software with thousands rather than millions of users<p>Yep, guess which software shows up as a toy CTF challenge for the weekend? Just because you can understand how something works doesn’t mean it’s secure.
评论 #36114864 未加载
评论 #36114207 未加载
arek_nawoalmost 2 years ago
With the mindset described, I&#x27;d say most of the software that the World runs on nowadays shouldn&#x27;t be used. Also:<p>&gt; My first resolution is just to bring less software into my life. It is still early days, we don&#x27;t really understand computers yet.<p>While philosophically kind-of true, this approach - especially for things to come - will get you quickly lost in the modern &quot;software-eaten&quot; World, IMHO.
onnnonalmost 2 years ago
Video presentation link:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=u6fjjaq8JCI">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=u6fjjaq8JCI</a>
评论 #36116567 未加载
halicarnassusalmost 2 years ago
While the premise of the post is interesting, I&#x27;ve stopped reading it when reaching &quot;a computer from 2015 is 2-5 times slower than an Apple 2e from 1986 just at reading a keystroke and displaying it on screen&quot; and only scanned the rest.<p>If oversimplifications are being used to prove a point, the argument becomes weak.<p>I actually read it some months ago, because I&#x27;m interested in the smol net, and I use and like the Gemini protocol quite a lot.<p>Unfortunately this post rants against perceived software obesity quite unreflectedly.
评论 #36113556 未加载