TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

At what point should MO recognise it needs to leave Stack Exchange Inc?

77 pointsby evahalmost 2 years ago

4 comments

capablewebalmost 2 years ago
&gt; While the MathOverflow site is operated by Stack Exchange, Inc., the domain and the MathOverflow name are owned by the MathOverflow corporation. The MathOverflow corporation is completely independent from Stack Exchange and its mission is to ensure the continued operation of the site in a manner that meets the needs and expectations of the community.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;meta.mathoverflow.net&#x2F;questions&#x2F;969&#x2F;who-owns-mathoverflow&#x2F;970#970" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;meta.mathoverflow.net&#x2F;questions&#x2F;969&#x2F;who-owns-mathove...</a><p>Really interesting setup they have there, I had no idea. Seemingly Stack Exchange runs the actual infrastructure and provides compute&#x2F;storage, but all the rest is operated by a separate 501(c)(3) nonprofit which at any time can pack up their stuff and migrate:<p>&gt; Subject to Section 8, should MathOverflow wish to migrate its data outside of the Stack Exchange network, Stack Exchange shall, within thirty (30) days of receipt of a written request from MathOverflow, provide MathOverflow with a complete and current database that contains all the data necessary to recreate MathOverflow on MathOverflow&#x27;s own servers and software. Following such transfer, Stack Exchange will cease all use of the MathOverflow database.
ksherlockalmost 2 years ago
So I take it the context is that SO is restricting the moderation of ChatGPT, et alia, generated answers. Also, to a lesser extent, SO has stopped the the Internet Archive data dump because they don&#x27;t want it to be used by ChatGPT, et alia. It kind of feels like they&#x27;re approaching the problem from the wrong end.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;meta.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;389811&#x2F;moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;meta.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;389811&#x2F;moderation-s...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;meta.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;389922&#x2F;june-2023-data-dump-is-missing&#x2F;390040#390040" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;meta.stackexchange.com&#x2F;questions&#x2F;389922&#x2F;june-2023-da...</a>
评论 #36276859 未加载
Incipientalmost 2 years ago
The core of the MO issues seem to be related to the change of licence to prevent free use by openai etc when training llms?<p>Considering the value they draw from the overflow communities, and thy threat they do provide (I&#x27;ve stopped using SO...) I do understand their reasoning.
ineedasernamealmost 2 years ago
This post lacks an explanation of context.<p>Can someone give a TLDR of this “network wide dispute” and how MO has role in it that differs from others?
评论 #36277268 未加载