TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

PG – multiple founders want people to return to the office

5 pointsby Nescoalmost 2 years ago

4 comments

ggmalmost 2 years ago
What cost are founders willing to pay for this vision of their employee-employer relations?<p>Fundamentally that&#x27;s what it comes down to. Maybe the 10% sackings in the FAANG was the reset to force costs of labour down, and it worked, or maybe knowledge worker unions will happen at scale and founders will have to accept what to them looks like a tractable cost containment is in fact unavoidable: if you need specific skills then expect to pay net present value for them.<p>I increasingly like to see founders as parasites, not creative geniuses. Theranos wasn&#x27;t unusual, what was unusual was believing medical tech was the thing to play in.<p>I wish we had more people like the ones we had in Xerox Park, Bell labs, and IBM&#x27;s labs.<p>Get rich quick IPO nonsense is ruining tech.
评论 #36289129 未加载
评论 #36280838 未加载
senttoschoolalmost 2 years ago
Are people still going to try to blame office lease agreements for management wanting workers back in the office?<p>When are remote workers going to start blaming themselves? Clearly, companies big and small are recalling their workers back to their office. Clearly, they have data showing that their productivity metrics have declined. Tech management are usually very data-driven compared to other industries. So if they&#x27;re recalling workers, then they must see something.<p>The simplest explanation is that remote&#x2F;hybrid culture is less productive on some metric - whether it&#x27;s total company output or less creativity or whatever it is. So while an individual remote worker might perceive himself or herself as being more productive, they often do not think at the level of the total company output.<p>And no, they aren&#x27;t going to come out and explicitly say that their WFH workers are lazier and less productive. That&#x27;s just bad PR. But you can infer what management is seeing from their actions.
评论 #36289155 未加载
评论 #36281312 未加载
catchnear4321almost 2 years ago
many big names have been “warning” about this day coming.<p>interesting how many of those names have commercial property investments. direct or indirect.<p>could it be related?
oriettaxxalmost 2 years ago
yes, I guess part of the reason why they did what they did is having people around you that recognize what you did, the fact that you are the genius&#x2F;boss&#x2F;brave...<p>and all of this is lost if workers are at home